Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ARDMORE PURPOSE

IMO: 9859208
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 493,424 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.85 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: GWN 2, NORDTOKYO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Reederei Nord B.V.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 493,424 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

92.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

0.59

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

9.8 kn

Fuel per day at sea

21.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,505 t

CO₂ emitted

4,745 t

4,819 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

16,298 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,663 h

69 days, 19% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 74.8 kg/nm · median 129 (−42%)

79.5Ranks 138 of 1,787, lowest first194

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 10.9 (+1%)

8.1Faster than 53% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.98 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (+11%)

4.44Ranks 1,042 of 1,787, lowest first25.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports29%
From the EU37%
Into the EU19%
At berth in the EU15%

43% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,051 t).

Fuel burned laden

576 t

38% of all fuel; 62% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

735 t

15.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+74 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ARDMORE PURPOSE
Oil tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ARDMORE PURPOSE
Oil tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ARDMORE PURPOSE
Oil tanker median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	+23%	+10%	+76%	–	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.0 kn	−12%	−25%	+590%	−44%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.8 kn	−2%	+39%	−93%	+79%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	−7%	−16%	−44%	+10%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+3%	−3%	+117%	+3%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Reederei Nord B.V.	637	2,004	7,169	695	10.3	88.8	8.91	–
2025	Anglo Ardmore Ship Management Pte. Ltd.	1,505	4,745	16,298	1,663	9.8	92.3	0.59	38%
2024	Reederei Nord B.V.	690	2,170	9,235	838	11.0	74.8	8.98	–
2023	not published	113	354	1,339	103	13.0	84.6	16.0	–
2022	not published	1,649	5,172	19,165	2,079	9.2	86.0	8.95	–
2021	not published	3,141	9,864	34,062	3,338	10.2	92.2	8.13	–
2020	not published	1,415	4,439	15,731	1,463	10.7	89.9	7.88	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Reederei Nord B.V.	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2025	Anglo Ardmore Ship Management Pte. Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ABS	B+C
2024	Reederei Nord B.V.	8.98	8.06	+11%	1,042 of 1,787	DNV	B
2023	not published	16.0	8.44	+90%	1,450 of 1,797	DNV	B
2022	not published	8.95	8.51	+5%	1,047 of 1,961	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	8.13	8.86	−8%	785 of 1,789	DNV	B
2020	not published	7.88	9.03	−13%	752 of 1,870	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.