Navalyze · Con-ro · Ship

GRANDE AFRICA

IMO: 9130949
Type: Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EIV 8.11 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB · part of Grimaldi Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

133.3

Con-ro median 135.4 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

7.63

g CO₂/m³·nm · Con-ro median 9.92 (−23%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Con-ro median 13.9 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

41.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,937 t

CO₂ emitted

18,617 t

18,908 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

44,545 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,449 h

144 days, 39% of the year

Within the con-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 58 con-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 133.3 kg/nm · median 135.4 (−2%)

95.0Ranks 27 of 58, lowest first162.0

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 13.9 (−7%)

12.9Faster than 9% of con-ro ships15.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 7.63 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.92 (−23%)

4.60Ranks 15 of 58, lowest first40.84

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Con-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU27%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU5%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (11,162 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

929 t

5.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+291 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Con-ro median is the middle ship of all con-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GRANDE AFRICA
Con-ro median

110.0120.0130.0140.0150.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GRANDE AFRICA
Con-ro median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

GRANDE AFRICA
Con-ro median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	+3%	−7%	+30%	+26%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+2%	+0%	−16%	−19%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+5%	+3%	−6%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+6%	+10%	+23%	+21%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−19%	−19%	+42%	−19%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−3.0 kn	+15%	−5%	−46%	+2%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.1 kn	+2%	+16%	+3%	+33%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB	5,937	18,617	44,545	3,449	12.9	133.3	–	–
2024	ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB	4,439	13,952	34,239	2,405	14.2	129.7	–	–
2023	not published	5,198	16,327	40,742	2,817	14.5	127.6	–	–
2022	not published	5,276	16,539	43,336	2,942	14.7	121.8	–	–
2021	not published	4,027	12,626	35,189	2,472	14.2	114.5	–	–
2020	not published	3,521	11,045	24,768	1,754	14.1	142.1	–	–
2019	not published	5,662	17,751	45,807	2,681	17.1	123.6	–	–
2018	not published	5,409	16,974	44,614	2,976	15.0	121.2	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	Con-ro median	vs Con-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB	7.63	9.92	−23%	15 of 58	RINA	A
2024	ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB	6.07	9.36	−35%	11 of 64	RINA	A
2023	not published	7.51	8.42	−11%	23 of 56	RINA	A
2022	not published	7.88	7.68	+3%	33 of 59	RINA	A
2021	not published	6.50	8.10	−20%	16 of 62	RINA	A
2020	not published	7.99	8.53	−6%	26 of 69	RINA	A
2019	not published	7.82	9.58	−18%	21 of 67	RINA	A
2018	not published	5.86	11.58	−49%	1 of 65	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Con-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's con-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.