Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Grimaldi Groupyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Grimaldi Group | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 125 |
| CO₂ emitted | 3.7 Mt−5.6% |
| Fuel per mile | 155 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 15.9 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 5.3% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Ro-pax |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Ro-pax
CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 567
- Grimaldi Group694 (+23% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
CO₂ per transport work (freight) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 253
- Grimaldi Group118 (−53% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work (pax) | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grimaldi Group | 25 | 694 118 freight | +23% −53% freight | 200 | 17.9 | 5,478 | 5.9% | – |
| Segment median | 567 253 freight | 0% |
Ro-ro
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 95.2
- Grimaldi Group79.1 (−17% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grimaldi Group | 30 | 79.1 | −17% | 143 | 16.4 | 5,274 | 5.1% | – |
| Segment median | 95.2 | 0% |
Con-ro
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 9.9
- Grimaldi Group8.5 (−15% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grimaldi Group | 47 | 8.5 | −15% | 139 | 13.8 | 3,137 | 4.5% | – |
| Segment median | 9.9 | 0% |
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4
- Grimaldi Group81.7 (+48% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grimaldi Group | 23 | 81.7 | +48% | 101 | 14.3 | 2,847 | 4.6% | – |
| Segment median | 55.4 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grimaldi Group | RINA (125) | 83% | 9% | 8% | 0% |
Grimaldi Group: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KYDON PALACE | 9204568 | Ro-pax | 2,022 g CO₂/pax·nm 131 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +257% −48% | 17.9 | 60,233 t | €3.1m |
| CORFU' | 9349758 | Ro-pax | 1,693 g CO₂/pax·nm 82.1 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +199% −68% | 17.2 | 37,362 t | €1.9m |
| FLORENCIA | 9287584 | Ro-pax | 1,398 g CO₂/pax·nm 83.8 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +147% −67% | 19.0 | 51,163 t | €2.7m |
| CRUISE ROMA | 9351476 | Ro-pax | 1,363 g CO₂/pax·nm 75.3 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +141% −70% | 21.4 | 119,158 t | €5.3m |
| VENEZIA | 9304631 | Ro-pax | 1,356 g CO₂/pax·nm 79.5 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +139% −69% | 18.9 | 51,265 t | €2.7m |
| CRUISE BARCELONA | 9351488 | Ro-pax | 1,251 g CO₂/pax·nm 78.5 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +121% −69% | 21.2 | 100,073 t | €3.8m |
| CATANIA | 9261554 | Ro-pax | 974 g CO₂/pax·nm 126 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +72% −50% | 17.3 | 51,640 t | €1.6m |
| EUROPA PALACE | 9198939 | Ro-pax | 945 g CO₂/pax·nm 64.4 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +67% −75% | 18.1 | 63,557 t | €3.3m |
| CRUISE AUSONIA | 9227429 | Ro-pax | 889 g CO₂/pax·nm 111 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +57% −56% | 18.4 | 50,709 t | €2.7m |
| GRANDE GUINEA | 9437919 | Con-ro | 15.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 9.9 | +56% | 13.0 | 12,746 t | €432k |
| FINNPULP | 9212644 | Ro-ro | 108 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.5 | +41% | 16.3 | 39,607 t | €2.1m |
| CRUISE BONARIA | 9204063 | Ro-pax | 794 g CO₂/pax·nm 141 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +40% −44% | 17.4 | 42,511 t | €1.5m |
| FINNMILL | 9212656 | Ro-ro | 106 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.5 | +38% | 16.3 | 42,509 t | €2.2m |
| GRANDE ROMA | 9247936 | Vehicle carrier | 217 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | +37% | 13.5 | 6,548 t | €131k |
| FINNWAVE | 9468932 | Ro-ro | 105 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.5 | +37% | 16.7 | 48,572 t | €2.5m |
| EUROCARGO ALEXANDRIA | 9465540 | Ro-ro | 104 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.5 | +36% | 15.5 | 41,439 t | €2.2m |
| ECO BARCELONA | 9859545 | Ro-ro | 66.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 49.0 | +36% | 17.4 | 49,068 t | €2.6m |
| GRANDE HALIFAX | 9784051 | Vehicle carrier | 75.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | +35% | 15.1 | 14,337 t | €515k |
| GRANDE NEW JERSEY | 9782704 | Vehicle carrier | 74.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | +34% | 15.4 | 12,035 t | €412k |
| ZEUS PALACE | 9208071 | Ro-pax | 755 g CO₂/pax·nm 117 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +33% −54% | 18.4 | 57,088 t | €2.9m |
| GRANDE CALIFORNIA | 9796377 | Vehicle carrier | 73.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | +33% | 15.9 | 14,885 t | €445k |
| GRANDE COSTA D'AVORIO | 9465382 | Con-ro | 13.0 g CO₂/m³·nm | 9.9 | +31% | 13.6 | 15,965 t | €583k |
| KNOSSOS PALACE | 9220330 | Ro-pax | 738 g CO₂/pax·nm 71.0 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | +30% −72% | 21.5 | 62,864 t | €265k |
| REPUBBLICA DEL BRASILE | 9138422 | Con-ro | 12.7 g CO₂/m³·nm | 9.9 | +28% | 11.1 | 11,948 t | €391k |
| GRANDE MAROCCO | 9437907 | Con-ro | 12.6 g CO₂/m³·nm | 9.9 | +27% | 14.6 | 14,316 t | €491k |
| GRANDE MELBOURNE | 9992684 | Vehicle carrier | 44.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.1 | +25% | 14.0 | 1,431 t | €47k |
| GRANDE TEXAS | 9796365 | Vehicle carrier | 69.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | +25% | 15.6 | 13,966 t | €392k |
| FINNTIDE | 9468920 | Ro-ro | 95.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.5 | +25% | 17.3 | 46,777 t | €2.5m |
| GRANDE AUCKLAND | 9992672 | Vehicle carrier | 53.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 43.7 | +23% | 11.2 | 606 t | €26k |
| GRANDE TOGO | 9465370 | Con-ro | 12.2 g CO₂/m³·nm | 9.9 | +23% | 13.2 | 17,446 t | €576k |
30 of 125 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.