Navalyze · Con-ro · Ship

GRANDE ATLANTICO

IMO: 9130951
Type: Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EIV 8.11 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB · part of Grimaldi Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

131.0

Con-ro median 135.4 kg/nm (−3%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

8.30

g CO₂/m³·nm · Con-ro median 9.92 (−16%)

Average speed

13.5 kn

Con-ro median 13.9 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,961 t

CO₂ emitted

21,853 t

22,194 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

53,129 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,939 h

164 days, 45% of the year

Within the con-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 58 con-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 131.0 kg/nm · median 135.4 (−3%)

95.0Ranks 23 of 58, lowest first162.0

Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 13.9 (−3%)

12.9Faster than 31% of con-ro ships15.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.30 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.92 (−16%)

4.60Ranks 18 of 58, lowest first40.84

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Con-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU34%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU4%

63% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (13,687 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

852 t

3.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+341 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Con-ro median is the middle ship of all con-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GRANDE ATLANTICO
Con-ro median

110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GRANDE ATLANTICO
Con-ro median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

GRANDE ATLANTICO
Con-ro median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−5%	−6%	+44%	+17%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+10%	+4%	−10%	−6%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	+0%	+2%	−5%	+16%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+9%	+9%	−12%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.8 kn	−8%	−18%	+37%	−2%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	−7%	−11%	+2%	−17%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.6 kn	−3%	+1%	−5%	−5%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB	6,961	21,853	53,129	3,939	13.5	131.0	–	–
2024	ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB	5,114	16,060	36,929	2,722	13.6	138.5	–	–
2023	not published	5,152	16,185	41,034	2,857	14.4	125.5	–	–
2022	not published	5,389	16,928	43,093	3,039	14.2	125.1	–	–
2021	not published	5,618	17,620	48,976	3,442	14.2	114.7	–	–
2020	not published	4,438	13,919	35,722	2,226	16.0	124.2	–	–
2019	not published	4,687	14,714	35,026	2,101	16.7	133.8	–	–
2018	not published	5,079	15,935	36,989	2,296	16.1	137.3	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	Con-ro median	vs Con-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB	8.30	9.92	−16%	18 of 58	RINA	A
2024	ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB	7.09	9.36	−24%	16 of 64	RINA	A
2023	not published	7.52	8.42	−11%	24 of 56	RINA	A
2022	not published	6.49	7.68	−15%	15 of 59	RINA	A
2021	not published	6.62	8.10	−18%	17 of 62	RINA	A
2020	not published	6.74	8.53	−21%	13 of 69	RINA	A
2019	not published	8.10	9.58	−15%	23 of 67	RINA	A
2018	not published	8.57	11.58	−26%	22 of 65	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Con-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's con-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.