Navalyze · Con-ro · Ship

GRANDE ARGENTINA

IMO: 9198135
Type: Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EIV 8.11 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB · part of Grimaldi Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

136.1

Con-ro median 135.4 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

8.45

g CO₂/m³·nm · Con-ro median 9.92 (−15%)

Average speed

13.2 kn

Con-ro median 13.9 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

43.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,805 t

CO₂ emitted

15,102 t

15,338 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

35,319 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,680 h

112 days, 31% of the year

Within the con-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 58 con-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 136.1 kg/nm · median 135.4 (+1%)

95.0Ranks 30 of 58, lowest first162.0

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 13.9 (−5%)

12.9Faster than 22% of con-ro ships15.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.45 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.92 (−15%)

4.60Ranks 20 of 58, lowest first40.84

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Con-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU32%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU5%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,015 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

705 t

4.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+236 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Con-ro median is the middle ship of all con-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GRANDE ARGENTINA
Con-ro median

125.0130.0135.0140.0145.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GRANDE ARGENTINA
Con-ro median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

GRANDE ARGENTINA
Con-ro median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	+6%	−1%	−12%	+29%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−2%	−3%	−4%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−2%	−3%	−10%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	+5%	−0%	+21%	+19%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−9%	−10%	−13%	−26%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.3 kn	−1%	−9%	−1%	+1%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	+4%	+7%	+9%	+22%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB	4,805	15,102	35,319	2,680	13.2	136.1	–	–
2024	ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB	5,169	16,219	40,330	2,853	14.1	128.2	–	–
2023	not published	5,482	17,196	41,837	2,924	14.3	131.0	–	–
2022	not published	6,231	19,536	46,555	3,240	14.4	133.8	–	–
2021	not published	4,872	15,277	38,350	2,519	15.2	127.0	–	–
2020	not published	6,133	19,250	44,022	2,847	15.5	139.3	–	–
2019	not published	6,267	19,657	44,653	2,659	16.8	140.3	–	–
2018	not published	5,543	17,408	40,956	2,505	16.3	135.3	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	Con-ro median	vs Con-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB	8.45	9.92	−15%	20 of 58	RINA	A
2024	ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB	6.54	9.36	−30%	12 of 64	RINA	A
2023	not published	6.06	8.42	−28%	10 of 56	RINA	A
2022	not published	7.68	7.68	+0%	30 of 59	RINA	A
2021	not published	6.48	8.10	−20%	15 of 62	RINA	A
2020	not published	8.75	8.53	+3%	38 of 69	RINA	A
2019	not published	8.69	9.58	−9%	26 of 67	RINA	A
2018	not published	7.14	11.58	−38%	12 of 65	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Con-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's con-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.