Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

PENELOP

IMO: 9325908
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 48,976 t
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.28 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Lundqvist Rederierna AB

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 48,976 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

172

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+34%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+41%)

Average speed

8.4 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−21%)

Fuel per day at sea

34.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,322 t

CO₂ emitted

13,767 t

13,979 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

25,165 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,000 h

125 days, 34% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 172 kg/nm · median 129 (+34%)

76.1Ranks 1,380 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 8.4 kn · median 10.7 (−21%)

8.0Faster than 12% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+41%)

4.51Ranks 1,166 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports29%
From the EU26%
Into the EU29%
At berth in the EU16%

72% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,942 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,185 t

15.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+212 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PENELOP
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PENELOP
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PENELOP
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+9%	+11%	−2%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−3%	−1%	−11%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−11%	−13%	+3%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	+12%	+28%	+0%	+67%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.1 kn	−2%	−31%	−20%	−5%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.5 kn	+15%	+104%	−26%	+10%	4.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	−7%	+17%	+39%	−22%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Lundqvist Rederierna AB	4,322	13,767	25,165	3,000	8.4	172	11.2	–
2024	Lundqvist Rederierna AB	4,043	12,896	25,551	3,104	8.2	158	12.6	–
2023	not published	4,695	15,053	28,647	3,554	8.1	164	12.0	–
2022	not published	5,080	16,284	27,696	3,336	8.3	183	14.1	–
2021	not published	4,547	14,517	27,689	3,821	7.2	164	8.44	–
2020	not published	5,841	18,681	34,773	3,372	10.3	168	8.93	–
2019	not published	6,847	21,824	47,035	8,069	5.8	146	8.13	–
2018	not published	5,330	17,088	33,952	7,295	4.7	157	10.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Lundqvist Rederierna AB	11.2	7.95	+41%	1,166 of 1,665	DNV	B+C
2024	Lundqvist Rederierna AB	12.6	8.06	+56%	1,349 of 1,787	DNV	B
2023	not published	12.0	8.44	+42%	1,294 of 1,797	DNV	B
2022	not published	14.1	8.51	+66%	1,502 of 1,961	DNV	B
2021	not published	8.44	8.86	−5%	834 of 1,789	DNV	B
2020	not published	8.93	9.03	−1%	918 of 1,870	DNV	B
2019	not published	8.13	8.83	−8%	837 of 1,919	DNV	B
2018	not published	10.5	8.86	+18%	1,089 of 1,779	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.