Navalyze · Container · Ship

SUNAID X

IMO: 9358539
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 3,634 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 30.79 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: MAX PRIDE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Kontor 17 MPM GmbH

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,634 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

67.1

Container median 177 kg/nm (−62%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

58.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+259%)

Average speed

9.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−27%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,609 t

CO₂ emitted

8,263 t

8,391 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

38,874 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,007 h

167 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 67.1 kg/nm · median 177 (−62%)

78.8Ranks 82 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.7 kn · median 13.3 (−27%)

9.1Faster than 14% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 58.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+259%)

7.22Ranks 2,102 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports52%
From the EU26%
Into the EU19%
At berth in the EU3%

78% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,414 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

231 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+128 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SUNAID X
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SUNAID X
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SUNAID X
Container median

0.025.050.075.0100125

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	−16%	−8%	+19%	−20%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	+23%	+1%	−29%	−9%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+9%	+2%	+44%	+39%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.6 kn	−16%	−3%	+12%	−44%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.6 kn	+8%	−15%	+82%	+160%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.3 kn	−17%	+2%	−70%	−58%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.4 kn	+2%	−11%	−22%	+26%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	2,609	8,263	38,874	4,007	9.7	67.1	58.5	–
2024	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	2,613	8,167	32,640	3,683	8.9	80.0	72.8	–
2023	not published	2,968	9,269	45,814	4,244	10.8	64.8	80.1	–
2022	not published	1,896	5,982	31,867	2,778	11.5	59.5	57.4	–
2021	not published	2,017	6,363	28,363	2,856	9.9	71.1	102	–
2020	not published	1,023	3,231	15,565	1,242	12.5	65.7	39.3	–
2019	not published	4,093	12,792	51,586	5,068	10.2	79.3	94.7	–
2018	not published	5,178	16,169	66,332	5,702	11.6	78.1	74.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	58.5	16.3	+259%	2,102 of 2,208	DNV	A+C
2024	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	72.8	17.5	+315%	1,915 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	80.1	19.4	+313%	1,878 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	57.4	19.1	+200%	1,686 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	102	17.9	+471%	1,776 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	39.3	17.6	+124%	1,468 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	94.7	18.9	+401%	1,774 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	74.9	20.2	+270%	1,639 of 1,705	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.