Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE HAMMERSMITH

IMO: 9395147
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 63,012 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EIV 18.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SHUNZAN KAIUN CO., LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 63,012 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

215

Container median 177 kg/nm (+21%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (−35%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

75.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,172 t

CO₂ emitted

47,355 t

48,100 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

70,565 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,812 h

201 days, 55% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 215 kg/nm · median 177 (+21%)

78.8Ranks 1,376 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 13.3 (+11%)

9.1Faster than 72% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−35%)

7.22Ranks 651 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU48%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU1%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (24,876 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

668 t

1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.8 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+745 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ONE HAMMERSMITH
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE HAMMERSMITH
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE HAMMERSMITH
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−9%	−9%	+45%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.2 kn	+2%	−6%	−7%	–	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	−15%	−21%	+36%	+3%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	+6%	+12%	−17%	+8%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	+1%	−7%	+4%	+1%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	−6%	−2%	+71%	−15%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SHUNZAN KAIUN CO., LTD.	15,172	47,355	70,565	4,812	14.7	215	10.7	–
2024	SHUNZAN KAIUN CO., LTD.	11,527	36,028	48,700	3,328	14.6	237	–	–
2023	not published	12,122	38,270	52,094	3,307	15.8	233	11.8	–
2022	not published	10,475	33,078	38,315	2,252	17.0	273	11.5	–
2021	not published	11,902	37,565	46,305	2,856	16.2	257	10.7	–
2020	not published	11,326	35,762	44,440	2,537	17.5	255	10.5	–
2019	not published	7,071	22,115	25,976	1,549	16.8	272	12.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SHUNZAN KAIUN CO., LTD.	10.7	16.3	−35%	651 of 2,208	ClassNK	C
2024	SHUNZAN KAIUN CO., LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	11.8	19.4	−39%	524 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	11.5	19.1	−40%	447 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	10.7	17.9	−40%	376 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	10.5	17.6	−40%	419 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	12.4	18.9	−34%	472 of 1,788	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.