Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- SHUNZAN KAIUN CO., LTD.your view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| SHUNZAN KAIUN CO., LTD. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 8 |
| CO₂ emitted | 78,530 t+6.5% |
| Fuel kg/nm | 141 |
| Average speed | 12.6 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 1.7% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- SHUNZAN KAIUN CO., LTD.10.7 (−35% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin container | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs container medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHUNZAN KAIUN CO., LTD. | 1 | 10.7 | −35% | 215 | 14.7 | 4,812 | 1.4% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.90
- SHUNZAN KAIUN CO., LTD.4.73 (−40% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin bulk carrier | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs bulk carrier medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHUNZAN KAIUN CO., LTD. | 5 | 4.73 | −40% | 89.2 | 11.0 | 1,903 | 1.9% | – |
| Segment median | 7.90 | 0% |
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4
- SHUNZAN KAIUN CO., LTD.293 (+430% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin vehicle carrier | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs vehicle carrier medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHUNZAN KAIUN CO., LTD. | 2 | 293 | +430% | 98.6 | 14.5 | 790 | 2.9% | – |
| Segment median | 55.4 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHUNZAN KAIUN CO., LTD. | ClassNK (8) | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
SHUNZAN KAIUN CO., LTD.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUGONG ACE | 9777838 | Vehicle carrier | 533 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | +862% | 15.7 | 4,338 t | €129k | €91k |
| SAKURA FORTUNE | 9881172 | Bulk carrier | 14.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.90 | +82% | 11.3 | 4,284 t | €122k | €0 |
| LAVENDER ACE | 9363948 | Vehicle carrier | 53.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | −3% | 12.7 | 2,771 t | €84k | €0 |
| THOUSAND SPRING | 9867425 | Bulk carrier | 6.06 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.90 | −23% | 11.5 | 9,997 t | €267k | €54k |
| ONE HAMMERSMITH | 9395147 | Container | 10.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.3 | −35% | 14.7 | 47,355 t | €1.3m | €43k |
| SPRING CITRUS | 9905215 | Bulk carrier | 3.41 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.90 | −57% | 9.1 | 3,204 t | €87k | €0 |
| SPRING HARMONY | 9983578 | Bulk carrier | 2.47 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.90 | −69% | 10.7 | 5,909 t | €158k | €0 |
30 of 8 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.