Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

BOMAR OSPREY

IMO: 9396024
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 9,244 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.90 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SICHEM OSPREY, TEAM OSPREY, EASTERLY OSPREY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: V.Ships Asia Group Pte. Ltd · part of V.Ships

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,244 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

80.0

Chemical tanker median 80.8 kg/nm (−1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

27.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.7 (+63%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.0 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,719 t

CO₂ emitted

5,408 t

5,492 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

21,498 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,899 h

79 days, 22% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 80.0 kg/nm · median 80.8 (−1%)

53.8Ranks 622 of 1,274, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 11.0 (+3%)

8.7Faster than 59% of chemical tanker ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 27.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.7 (+63%)

8.47Ranks 941 of 1,274, lowest first42.0

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports30%
From the EU32%
Into the EU29%
At berth in the EU9%

15% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (801 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

471 t

8.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+84 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BOMAR OSPREY
Chemical tanker median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

BOMAR OSPREY
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BOMAR OSPREY
Chemical tanker median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−22%	−26%	−34%	+0%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+14%	+8%	+4%	+10%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.6 kn	−19%	−6%	+16%	−19%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+30%	+27%	−9%	+64%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	−4%	−8%	−21%	−20%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+4.6 kn	−17%	+36%	−1%	−23%	4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024part-year	V.Ships Asia Group Pte. Ltd	1,260	3,972	15,542	1,418	11.0	81.1	27.9	–
2024	Borealis Denizcilik A.S	1,719	5,408	21,498	1,899	11.3	80.0	27.2	–
2023	not published	3,351	10,533	32,456	2,739	11.8	103	27.2	–
2022	not published	2,830	8,897	31,331	2,500	12.5	90.3	24.7	–
2021	not published	2,990	9,498	26,951	2,474	10.9	111	30.5	–
2020	not published	2,522	8,000	29,589	2,646	11.2	85.2	18.6	–
2019	not published	3,309	10,413	37,434	3,182	11.8	88.4	23.3	–
2018	not published	4,048	12,728	37,874	5,286	7.2	107	30.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	V.Ships Asia Group Pte. Ltd	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2024	Borealis Denizcilik A.S	27.2	16.7	+63%	941 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023	not published	27.2	16.2	+67%	980 of 1,314	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	24.7	16.1	+54%	1,045 of 1,409	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	30.5	16.7	+83%	1,070 of 1,343	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	18.6	16.2	+15%	798 of 1,312	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	23.3	17.3	+35%	913 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	30.3	17.1	+77%	1,024 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.