Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

V.Ships
Ships58
CO₂ emitted486 kt
Fuel per mile129 kg/nm
Average speed11.5 kn
CO₂ at berth7.4%
Ships burning LNG5
Main segmentOil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • V.Ships5.1 (−37%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
V.Ships225.1−37%15710.92,0996.8%3
Segment median 8.10%

Passenger

CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 618

  • V.Ships1,214 (+96%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
V.Ships41,214+96%19113.93,53010.9%–
Segment median 6180%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • V.Ships6.8 (−16%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
V.Ships136.8−16%9611.41,7703.1%–
Segment median 8.10%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

  • V.Ships10.9 (−35%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
V.Ships810.9−35%8710.71,95411.0%–
Segment median 16.70%

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5

  • V.Ships27.9 (+59%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
V.Ships627.9+59%5811.41,8915.4%2
Segment median 17.50%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.8

  • V.Ships54.8 (+53%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
V.Ships354.8+53%4210.52,5104.3%–
Segment median 35.80%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
V.ShipsLloyd's Register (53), DNV (5)0%91%7%0%

V.Ships: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
CRYSTAL SERENITY9243667Passenger1,938 g CO₂/pax·nm618+213%14.05,440 t€89k
CRYSTAL SYMPHONY9066667Passenger1,802 g CO₂/pax·nm618+191%13.329,976 t€766k
FAIR WINDS9327009Oil tanker11.4 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+80%9.69,295 t€143k
BIG DOG9256377Container82.9 g CO₂/t·nm47.2+75%12.41,648 t€25k
FORTUNA I9388479Chemical tanker59.8 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+45%9.25,830 t€158k
NORDIC VEGA9412581Oil tanker5.7 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+27%9.24,687 t€84k
VESTA9629938Oil tanker12.5 g CO₂/t·nm9.9+26%11.56,920 t€62k
NORDIC CROSS9438418Oil tanker9.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.4+18%10.521,568 t€338k
BAM ARION9414450Bulk carrier17.1 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+13%8.32,041 t€38k
GULF SUNRISE9788887Oil tanker5.1 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+13%8.07,132 t€110k
NORDIC BREEZE9588445Oil tanker7.1 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+12%11.623,016 t€365k
SEAWAYS TRITON9734654Oil tanker5.0 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+12%12.16,804 t€125k
PROPEL SUCCESS9640607Bulk carrier10.8 g CO₂/t·nm9.7+11%11.74,581 t€76k
PROPEL GRACE9605023Bulk carrier5.3 g CO₂/t·nm4.9+9%11.05,970 t€103k
COSMIC GLORY9877822Chemical tanker9.4 g CO₂/t·nm8.6+9%10.04,854 t€84k
BAM TRITON9414474Bulk carrier10.6 g CO₂/t·nm9.7+9%11.16,774 t€79k
SEAWAYS CAPE HENRY9727003Oil tanker4.9 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+8%11.86,966 t€115k
FAIR SKIES9284386Oil tanker9.0 g CO₂/t·nm8.4+7%11.88,106 t€131k
MIDNIGHT GLORY9877808Chemical tanker12.3 g CO₂/t·nm12.0+2%12.39,907 t€147k
SEAWAYS CREST9387920Chemical tanker8.8 g CO₂/t·nm8.6+2%12.22,290 t€35k
GIORGOS DRACOPOULOS9668403Bulk carrier6.8 g CO₂/t·nm6.7+2%11.93,095 t€53k
SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY9802683Passenger627 g CO₂/pax·nm618+1%14.045,183 t€836k
PROPEL SHAKTI9640592Bulk carrier6.7 g CO₂/t·nm6.70%11.11,418 t€23k
SPIRIT OF ADVENTURE9818084Passenger609 g CO₂/pax·nm618−2%14.036,645 t€680k
NORDIC HARRIER9921063Oil tanker4.4 g CO₂/t·nm4.5−2%11.83,519 t€57k
SEAWAYS LIBERTY9727027Oil tanker4.4 g CO₂/t·nm4.5−3%9.96,148 t€105k
PLATA GLORY9384590Oil tanker4.3 g CO₂/t·nm4.5−4%9.314,071 t€225k
NORDIC AQUARIUS9818216Oil tanker5.9 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−6%11.312,344 t€200k
SAPET GAS9922213Gas carrier (LPG)20.2 g CO₂/t·nm21.8−8%9.3857 t€14k
NORDIC HAWK9749491Oil tanker4.0 g CO₂/t·nm4.5−10%10.310,514 t€173k

30 of 58 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.