Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

GINGA LEOPARD

IMO: 9425992
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 21,987 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EIV 8.67 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TM SHIPMANAGEMENT CO., LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,987 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

83.4

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (−21%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,154 t

CO₂ emitted

3,623 t

3,680 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

13,836 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,143 h

48 days, 13% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 83.4 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+5%)

52.8Ranks 821 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 11.1 (+9%)

8.8Faster than 83% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−21%)

7.93Ranks 488 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU43%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU11%

59% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,149 t).

Fuel burned laden

951 t

82% of all fuel; 18% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

406 t

11.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+57 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GINGA LEOPARD
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0100.0110.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GINGA LEOPARD
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GINGA LEOPARD
Chemical tanker median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	−15%	−6%	+44%	−30%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	+41%	+20%	+52%	+79%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 41%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023	+0.8 kn	−35%	−31%	+17%	−65%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 35%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+21%	+24%	−77%	+84%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	+6%	+0%	−44%	+8%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TM SHIPMANAGEMENT CO., LTD.	1,154	3,623	13,836	1,143	12.1	83.4	11.9	82%
2024	TM SHIPMANAGEMENT CO., LTD.	941	2,953	9,630	876	11.0	97.7	17.0	79%
2023	not published	438	1,365	6,317	488	12.9	69.4	9.48	–
2021	not published	578	1,828	5,391	446	12.1	107	26.9	63%
2020	not published	2,073	6,513	23,462	1,984	11.8	88.3	14.6	77%
2019	not published	3,514	11,002	42,019	3,380	12.4	83.6	13.5	83%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TM SHIPMANAGEMENT CO., LTD.	11.9	15.0	−21%	488 of 1,460	ClassNK	B
2024	TM SHIPMANAGEMENT CO., LTD.	17.0	16.7	+1%	651 of 1,274	ClassNK	B
2023	not published	9.48	16.2	−42%	160 of 1,314	ClassNK	B
2021	not published	26.9	16.7	+61%	1,009 of 1,343	ClassNK	B
2020	not published	14.6	16.2	−10%	538 of 1,312	ClassNK	B
2019	not published	13.5	17.3	−22%	417 of 1,321	ClassNK	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.