Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

MIKELA P.

IMO: 9440382
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 110,162 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.83 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Marine Trust Ltd.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 110,162 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

146

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

4.13

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (−48%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,133 t

CO₂ emitted

6,661 t

6,765 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

14,640 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,202 h

50 days, 14% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 146 kg/nm · median 129 (+13%)

76.1Ranks 1,109 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 10.7 (+14%)

8.0Faster than 92% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 4.13 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−48%)

4.51Ranks 107 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU22%
Into the EU72%
At berth in the EU6%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,523 t).

Fuel burned laden

1,546 t

73% of all fuel; 28% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

386 t

5.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+104 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MIKELA P.
Oil tanker median

125.0150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MIKELA P.
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MIKELA P.
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−17%	−17%	+167%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+29%	+32%	−75%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+5.3 kn	−40%	+10%	+127%	−37%	5.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 40%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−5.6 kn	+33%	−29%	−80%	+25%	5.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 33%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−4%	−4%	+67%	+34%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+5.5 kn	−5%	+75%	+190%	−29%	5.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−6.0 kn	−11%	−54%	−52%	+45%	6.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Marine Trust Ltd.	2,133	6,661	14,640	1,202	12.2	146	4.13	73%
2024	Marine Trust Ltd.	963	3,051	5,480	453	12.1	176	5.20	68%
2023	not published	2,991	9,377	21,872	1,850	11.8	137	5.33	58%
2022	not published	2,180	6,924	9,645	1,488	6.5	226	8.52	55%
2021	not published	8,040	25,428	47,253	3,898	12.1	170	6.79	55%
2020	not published	5,042	15,945	28,362	2,342	12.1	178	5.07	–
2019	not published	1,835	5,738	9,790	1,494	6.6	187	7.13	–
2018	not published	4,284	13,418	20,406	1,618	12.6	210	4.93	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Marine Trust Ltd.	4.13	7.95	−48%	107 of 1,665	ABS	A
2024	Marine Trust Ltd.	5.20	8.06	−35%	331 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	5.33	8.44	−37%	286 of 1,797	ABS	A
2022	not published	8.52	8.51	+0%	986 of 1,961	ABS	A
2021	not published	6.79	8.86	−23%	555 of 1,789	ABS	A
2020	not published	5.07	9.03	−44%	217 of 1,870	ABS	A
2019	not published	7.13	8.83	−19%	641 of 1,919	ABS	A
2018	not published	4.93	8.86	−44%	269 of 1,779	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.