Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Marine Trust Ltd.your view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Marine Trust Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 19 |
| CO₂ emitted | 195,191 t |
| Fuel kg/nm | 141 |
| Average speed | 11.8 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 6.8% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Oil tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.06
- Marine Trust Ltd.5.82 (−28% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin oil tanker | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs oil tanker medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marine Trust Ltd. | 18 | 5.82 | −28% | 142 | 11.8 | 2,027 | 6.8% | – |
| Segment median | 8.06 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- Marine Trust Ltd.6.94 (−58% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin chemical tanker | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs chemical tanker medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marine Trust Ltd. | 1 | 6.94 | −58% | 88.8 | 11.5 | 1,117 | 3.1% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marine Trust Ltd. | ABS (19) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Marine Trust Ltd.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APANEMO | 9448164 | Oil tanker | 39.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | +384% | 10.5 | 2,375 t | €48k | €17k |
| SEMERU | 9388376 | Oil tanker | 9.64 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | +20% | 12.0 | 7,798 t | €134k | €17k |
| NAMRATA | 9401154 | Oil tanker | 9.41 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | +17% | 12.5 | 9,530 t | €157k | €17k |
| CE-BERMUDA | 9411226 | Oil tanker | 8.22 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | +2% | 12.2 | 8,272 t | €141k | €33k |
| SERENO | 9437658 | Oil tanker | 7.68 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | −5% | 12.1 | 5,610 t | €87k | €0 |
| APNOIA | 9448152 | Oil tanker | 7.58 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | −6% | 11.2 | 8,783 t | €138k | €0 |
| PSERIMOS | 9578658 | Oil tanker | 7.33 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | −9% | 12.3 | 5,052 t | €78k | €11k |
| MERBABU | 9388364 | Oil tanker | 6.42 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | −20% | 7.4 | 3,056 t | €56k | €900 |
| KAPSALI | 9587312 | Oil tanker | 6.09 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | −24% | 11.3 | 7,989 t | €129k | €34k |
| CAPTAIN A. STELLATOS | 9439670 | Oil tanker | 5.56 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | −31% | 10.1 | 14,516 t | €230k | €0 |
| MIKELA P. | 9440382 | Oil tanker | 5.20 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | −35% | 12.1 | 3,051 t | €51k | €7k |
| COSTAS P | 9934321 | Oil tanker | 5.00 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | −38% | 12.3 | 23,716 t | €380k | €0 |
| DINO | 9923994 | Oil tanker | 4.93 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | −39% | 11.5 | 11,609 t | €201k | €0 |
| LENI P. | 9594133 | Oil tanker | 4.83 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | −40% | 10.8 | 15,449 t | €250k | €17k |
| YANNIS P. | 9411343 | Oil tanker | 4.48 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | −44% | 12.3 | 12,929 t | €205k | €0 |
| DIMITRI | 9924015 | Oil tanker | 4.26 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | −47% | 12.7 | 22,929 t | €371k | €0 |
| POPI P | 9934319 | Oil tanker | 3.91 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | −51% | 11.8 | 13,772 t | €228k | €0 |
| AMALIA M | 9924003 | Oil tanker | 3.83 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.06 | −52% | 13.1 | 15,175 t | €260k | €0 |
| MERAPI | 9430167 | Chemical tanker | 6.94 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | −58% | 11.5 | 3,579 t | €55k | €0 |
30 of 19 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.