Navalyze · Container · Ship

PANTONIO

IMO: 9440576
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 3,846 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 31.26 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Kontor 17 MPM GmbH

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,846 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

78.9

Container median 177 kg/nm (−55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

64.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+297%)

Average speed

9.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−27%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,528 t

CO₂ emitted

4,822 t

4,897 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

19,368 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,989 h

83 days, 23% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 78.9 kg/nm · median 177 (−55%)

78.8Ranks 223 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.7 kn · median 13.3 (−27%)

9.1Faster than 14% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 64.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+297%)

7.22Ranks 2,142 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports33%
From the EU34%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU3%

68% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,274 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

141 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+75 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PANTONIO
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PANTONIO
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PANTONIO
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+15%	+16%	−46%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.5 kn	+14%	−9%	−21%	−10%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−20%	−13%	+49%	+0%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	−14%	−22%	−13%	+11%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+14%	+9%	−18%	−19%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.3 kn	−4%	−18%	−20%	−8%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	+12%	+23%	+1%	−2%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	1,528	4,822	19,368	1,989	9.7	78.9	64.7	–
2024	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	2,448	7,656	35,580	3,703	9.6	68.8	62.3	–
2023	not published	2,708	8,537	45,043	3,720	12.1	60.1	69.0	–
2022	not published	2,265	7,256	30,326	2,688	11.3	74.7	68.9	–
2021	not published	3,024	9,611	34,911	2,803	12.5	86.6	62.0	75%
2020	not published	3,233	10,124	42,412	3,279	12.9	76.2	76.9	–
2019	not published	4,219	13,196	53,329	3,518	15.2	79.1	83.2	–
2018	not published	3,727	11,694	52,795	3,808	13.9	70.6	84.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	64.7	16.3	+297%	2,142 of 2,208	DNV	A+C
2024	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	62.3	17.5	+256%	1,871 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	69.0	19.4	+256%	1,833 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	68.9	19.1	+260%	1,759 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	62.0	17.9	+246%	1,692 of 1,781	ABS	B
2020	not published	76.9	17.6	+338%	1,772 of 1,797	ABS	B
2019	not published	83.2	18.9	+341%	1,752 of 1,788	ABS	B
2018	not published	84.8	20.2	+319%	1,661 of 1,705	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.