Navalyze · Container · Ship

VENTO DI MEZZOGIORNO

IMO: 9440588
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 3,534 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 30.91 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: PENGALIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Kontor 17 MPM GmbH

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,534 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

75.1

Container median 177 kg/nm (−58%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

67.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+315%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,151 t

CO₂ emitted

16,384 t

16,637 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

68,580 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,350 h

223 days, 61% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 75.1 kg/nm · median 177 (−58%)

78.8Ranks 168 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 13.3 (−4%)

9.1Faster than 42% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 67.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+315%)

7.22Ranks 2,157 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (16,384 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

744 t

4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+253 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VENTO DI MEZZOGIORNO
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VENTO DI MEZZOGIORNO
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VENTO DI MEZZOGIORNO
Container median

0.025.050.075.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	+2%	−3%	+3%	−10%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+3.2 kn	+2%	+34%	+147%	−6%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−2%	+5%	−12%	+14%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.6 kn	−15%	−33%	+13%	+9%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.8 kn	+10%	−4%	+22%	−24%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.2 kn	+14%	+34%	−53%	−3%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	+5%	+2%	+2%	−10%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	5,151	16,384	68,580	5,350	12.8	75.1	67.6	–
2024	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	4,922	15,368	66,655	4,984	13.4	73.8	75.2	–
2023	not published	1,947	6,101	26,982	2,646	10.2	72.2	79.6	–
2022	not published	2,249	7,107	30,638	3,211	9.5	73.4	69.6	–
2021	not published	2,345	7,420	27,056	2,238	12.1	86.7	64.0	73%
2020	not published	1,741	5,486	22,092	1,593	13.9	78.8	84.3	–
2019	not published	3,260	10,399	46,954	4,002	11.7	69.4	86.8	–
2018	not published	3,029	9,712	46,053	3,786	12.2	65.8	96.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	67.6	16.3	+315%	2,157 of 2,208	DNV	A+C
2024	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	75.2	17.5	+329%	1,923 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	79.6	19.4	+310%	1,876 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	69.6	19.1	+264%	1,767 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	64.0	17.9	+257%	1,703 of 1,781	ABS	B
2020	not published	84.3	17.6	+380%	1,783 of 1,797	ABS	B
2019	not published	86.8	18.9	+360%	1,761 of 1,788	ABS	B
2018	not published	96.5	20.2	+377%	1,679 of 1,705	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.