Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

CLOTILDE

IMO: 9448310
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 16,812 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EIV 8.02 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NORD BUTTERFLY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: ANCORA INVESTMENT TRUST INC

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,812 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

105

Chemical tanker median 80.8 kg/nm (+30%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.7 (+18%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.0 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

926 t

CO₂ emitted

2,916 t

2,961 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

8,782 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

745 h

31 days, 9% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 105 kg/nm · median 80.8 (+30%)

53.8Ranks 1,082 of 1,274, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.8 kn · median 11.0 (+7%)

8.7Faster than 73% of chemical tanker ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.7 (+18%)

8.47Ranks 767 of 1,274, lowest first42.0

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports36%
From the EU22%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU22%

79% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,290 t).

Fuel burned laden

358 t

39% of all fuel; 61% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

627 t

21.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+45 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CLOTILDE
Chemical tanker median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

CLOTILDE
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CLOTILDE
Chemical tanker median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−12%	−11%	−66%	−29%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+15%	+13%	+55%	+44%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+4.0 kn	+0%	+51%	−31%	+10%	4.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−0%	+2%	−15%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	+3%	+28%	+6%	+14%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	+7%	−7%	−10%	+15%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	ANCORA INVESTMENT TRUST INC	926	2,916	8,782	745	11.8	105	19.8	39%
2023	not published	3,106	9,749	26,080	2,229	11.7	119	27.7	37%
2022	not published	1,736	5,474	16,806	1,409	11.9	103	19.3	41%
2021	not published	2,524	7,960	24,534	3,086	7.9	103	17.6	55%
2020	not published	2,975	9,437	28,839	3,697	7.8	103	19.8	–
2019	not published	2,704	8,531	27,096	4,298	6.3	99.8	17.4	–
2018	not published	2,833	8,900	30,268	4,172	7.3	93.6	15.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	ANCORA INVESTMENT TRUST INC	19.8	16.7	+18%	767 of 1,274	ABS	A
2023	not published	27.7	16.2	+71%	989 of 1,314	ABS	A
2022	not published	19.3	16.1	+20%	850 of 1,409	ABS	A
2021	not published	17.6	16.7	+5%	732 of 1,343	ABS	A
2020	not published	19.8	16.2	+23%	846 of 1,312	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	17.4	17.3	+1%	667 of 1,321	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	15.1	17.1	−12%	509 of 1,294	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.