Navalyze · Container · Ship

SVENDBORG

IMO: 9454230
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,325 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,325 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

70.0

Container median 177 kg/nm (−60%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

34.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+113%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,006 t

CO₂ emitted

12,550 t

12,747 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

57,279 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,036 h

210 days, 57% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 70.0 kg/nm · median 177 (−60%)

78.8Ranks 113 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 25% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+113%)

7.22Ranks 1,784 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports61%
From the EU20%
Into the EU14%
At berth in the EU5%

83% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (10,433 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

616 t

4.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+197 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SVENDBORG
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SVENDBORG
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SVENDBORG
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	−13%	−6%	+20%	−1%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	−2%	−12%	−16%	−19%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−3.1 kn	−10%	−28%	−37%	−18%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	+0%	+2%	−1%	−9%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.9 kn	+13%	+30%	+88%	+21%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.9 kn	−8%	+20%	−11%	+35%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−7%	−13%	+22%	−9%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	4,006	12,550	57,279	5,036	11.4	70.0	34.6	–
2024	TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	3,841	12,114	47,915	4,551	10.5	80.2	35.1	–
2023	not published	4,667	14,598	56,992	4,829	11.8	81.9	43.4	–
2022	not published	8,177	25,493	90,087	6,048	14.9	90.8	52.6	97%
2021	not published	8,260	25,757	91,036	6,258	14.5	90.7	58.0	94%
2020	not published	3,895	12,330	48,535	3,842	12.6	80.2	48.0	–
2019	not published	4,745	14,966	54,330	5,619	9.7	87.3	35.6	–
2018	not published	4,179	13,177	44,365	4,287	10.3	94.2	39.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	34.6	16.3	+113%	1,784 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	35.1	17.5	+100%	1,550 of 1,974	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	43.4	19.4	+124%	1,589 of 1,899	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	52.6	19.1	+175%	1,643 of 1,825	ABS	A+B
2021	not published	58.0	17.9	+224%	1,663 of 1,781	ABS	A+B
2020	not published	48.0	17.6	+173%	1,580 of 1,797	ABS	A+B
2019	not published	35.6	18.9	+88%	1,354 of 1,788	ABS	A+B
2018	not published	39.1	20.2	+93%	1,332 of 1,705	ABS	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.