Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KGyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 6 |
| CO₂ emitted | 50,470 t |
| Fuel kg/nm | 84.4 |
| Average speed | 10.1 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 5.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG38.6 (+120% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin container | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs container medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG | 6 | 38.6 | +120% | 84.4 | 10.1 | 3,152 | 5.1% | – |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG | DNV (6) | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONDERBORG | 9454242 | Container | 110 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +526% | 10.1 | 3,121 t | €57k | €32k |
| MITO | 9319571 | Container | 44.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +152% | 10.2 | 11,130 t | €219k | €0 |
| MARIELYST | 9448669 | Container | 41.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +139% | 9.8 | 13,668 t | €274k | €0 |
| ORNELLA | 9634660 | Container | 35.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +101% | 10.9 | 1,981 t | €21k | €0 |
| SVENDBORG | 9454230 | Container | 35.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +100% | 10.5 | 12,114 t | €287k | €0 |
| MACAO | 9362724 | Container | 25.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +46% | 9.6 | 8,455 t | €184k | €27k |
30 of 6 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.