Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

SOFIA

IMO: 9472086
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 38,251 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.14 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 38,251 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

93.6

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.69

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (−3%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,850 t

CO₂ emitted

5,812 t

5,903 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

19,759 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,763 h

73 days, 20% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 93.6 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+13%)

61.0Ranks 2,589 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 10.7 (+5%)

8.8Faster than 73% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.69 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−3%)

4.80Ranks 1,719 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU10%
Into the EU86%
At berth in the EU3%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,013 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

149 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+91 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SOFIA
Bulk carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SOFIA
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SOFIA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+6%	+4%	+1,902%	+23%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	+0.1 kn	−9%	−9%	−92%	−26%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.3 kn	−34%	−26%	+106%	−11%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 34%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	+24%	+14%	+18%	−46%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	+7%	+13%	−80%	+86%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	+7%	+5%	+74%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	1,850	5,812	19,759	1,763	11.2	93.6	7.69	–
2024	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	87	271	987	86	11.5	88.0	6.25	–
2022	not published	1,157	3,659	11,969	1,046	11.4	96.7	8.48	–
2021	not published	854	2,701	5,804	576	10.1	147	9.50	–
2020	not published	581	1,815	4,901	447	11.0	119	17.5	–
2019	not published	2,690	8,437	24,166	2,335	10.4	111	9.41	–
2018	not published	1,446	4,512	13,891	1,312	10.6	104	12.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	7.69	7.90	−3%	1,719 of 3,611	DNV	B
2024	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	6.25	8.09	−23%	794 of 3,089	DNV	B
2022	not published	8.48	8.71	−3%	1,877 of 3,968	DNV	B
2021	not published	9.50	8.57	+11%	2,100 of 3,466	DNV	B
2020	not published	17.5	8.24	+112%	2,958 of 3,150	DNV	B
2019	not published	9.41	8.38	+12%	2,073 of 3,360	DNV	B
2018	not published	12.4	8.50	+46%	2,738 of 3,384	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.