Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ATLAS

IMO: 9538177
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 19,532 t
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.98 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SUPER ECO TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,532 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

98.7

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+24%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+7%)

Average speed

8.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,361 t

CO₂ emitted

10,652 t

10,817 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

34,042 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,822 h

159 days, 44% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 98.7 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+24%)

52.8Ranks 1,158 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 8.9 kn · median 11.1 (−20%)

8.8Faster than 11% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+7%)

7.93Ranks 784 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports51%
From the EU11%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU17%

73% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,812 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,800 t

16.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+165 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ATLAS
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ATLAS
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ATLAS
Chemical tanker median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	+25%	+11%	+162%	+65%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−38%	−35%	−14%	−64%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 38%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+29%	+19%	−45%	+23%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	+12%	+20%	−26%	+37%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−15%	−10%	+32%	−2%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	+20%	+10%	−39%	−7%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−17%	−17%	+179%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SUPER ECO TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC	3,361	10,652	34,042	3,822	8.9	98.7	16.0	–
2024	SUPER ECO TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC	1,023	3,235	12,987	1,295	10.0	78.8	9.70	–
2023	not published	1,918	6,040	15,052	1,575	9.6	127	26.6	–
2022	not published	2,697	8,482	27,336	2,627	10.4	98.7	21.7	–
2021	not published	3,261	10,227	36,874	3,827	9.6	88.4	15.8	–
2020	not published	2,919	9,138	27,936	3,057	9.1	105	16.1	–
2019	not published	3,999	12,486	45,933	4,588	10.0	87.1	17.3	–
2018	not published	1,734	5,412	16,481	1,647	10.0	105	17.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SUPER ECO TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC	16.0	15.0	+7%	784 of 1,460	RINA	A
2024	SUPER ECO TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC	9.70	16.7	−42%	225 of 1,274	RINA	A
2023	not published	26.6	16.2	+64%	964 of 1,314	RINA	A
2022	not published	21.7	16.1	+35%	954 of 1,409	RINA	A
2021	not published	15.8	16.7	−5%	612 of 1,343	RINA	A
2020	not published	16.1	16.2	−1%	647 of 1,312	RINA	A
2019	not published	17.3	17.3	+0%	661 of 1,321	RINA	A
2018	not published	17.3	17.1	+1%	656 of 1,294	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.