Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

YANKUL SILVER

IMO: 9718791
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 46,762 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.27 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Oman Ship Management Company LLC

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 46,762 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

113

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.57

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (−50%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

879 t

CO₂ emitted

2,763 t

2,806 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

7,806 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

736 h

31 days, 8% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 113 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+41%)

52.8Ranks 1,329 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 11.1 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 36% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.57 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−50%)

7.93Ranks 110 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU48%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU7%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,476 t).

Fuel burned laden

820 t

93% of all fuel; 7% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

190 t

6.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+43 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

YANKUL SILVER
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

YANKUL SILVER
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

YANKUL SILVER
Chemical tanker median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−0.3 kn	+48%	+44%	+8%	+23%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 48%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−3%	−7%	−74%	−18%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2022	−0.9 kn	−10%	−16%	+81%	−41%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−5%	−5%	−41%	+24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Oman Ship Management Company LLC	879	2,763	7,806	736	10.6	113	7.57	93%
2023	not published	547	1,711	7,200	662	10.9	76.0	6.14	–
2022	not published	2,169	6,829	27,636	2,417	11.4	78.5	7.47	–
2019	not published	1,324	4,143	15,252	1,236	12.3	86.8	12.6	–
2018	not published	2,365	7,457	25,794	2,092	12.3	91.7	10.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Oman Ship Management Company LLC	7.57	15.0	−50%	110 of 1,460	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	6.14	16.2	−62%	12 of 1,314	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	7.47	16.1	−53%	44 of 1,409	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	12.6	17.3	−27%	357 of 1,321	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	10.2	17.1	−41%	185 of 1,294	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.