Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ANTARES

IMO: 9723019
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 20,632 t
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.85 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SUPER ECO TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,632 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

74.2

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−7%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (−24%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,631 t

CO₂ emitted

8,354 t

8,483 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

35,454 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,389 h

141 days, 39% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 74.2 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−7%)

52.8Ranks 594 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 11.1 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 33% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−24%)

7.93Ranks 453 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports35%
From the EU18%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU11%

67% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,598 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

892 t

10.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+129 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ANTARES
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ANTARES
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ANTARES
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+3.4 kn	−34%	−3%	+222%	−55%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 34%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.8 kn	+16%	−17%	−70%	+12%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+4%	+3%	+16%	+83%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+17%	+5%	−6%	+2%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.0 kn	−14%	+4%	+27%	−61%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.0 kn	+23%	+1%	−36%	+120%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−11%	+2%	+71%	−21%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SUPER ECO TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC	2,631	8,354	35,454	3,389	10.5	74.2	11.4	–
2024	SUPER ECO TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC	1,238	3,900	11,014	1,544	7.1	112	25.5	–
2023	not published	3,538	11,194	36,355	3,677	9.9	97.3	22.7	–
2022	not published	2,914	9,124	31,243	3,104	10.1	93.3	12.4	–
2021	not published	2,658	8,376	33,364	2,985	11.2	79.7	12.2	–
2020	not published	2,436	7,666	26,188	2,836	9.2	93.0	30.9	–
2019	not published	3,091	9,642	40,873	3,647	11.2	75.6	14.1	–
2018	not published	2,025	6,324	23,843	2,441	9.8	84.9	17.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SUPER ECO TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC	11.4	15.0	−24%	453 of 1,460	RINA	A
2024	SUPER ECO TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC	25.5	16.7	+52%	906 of 1,274	RINA	A
2023	not published	22.7	16.2	+40%	872 of 1,314	RINA	A
2022	not published	12.4	16.1	−23%	437 of 1,409	RINA	A
2021	not published	12.2	16.7	−27%	351 of 1,343	RINA	A
2020	not published	30.9	16.2	+91%	1,063 of 1,312	RINA	A
2019	not published	14.1	17.3	−19%	445 of 1,321	RINA	A
2018	not published	17.8	17.1	+4%	681 of 1,294	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.