Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ORIENTAL SAKURA

IMO: 9743746
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 10,874 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 8.44 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,874 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

46.5

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−42%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (−11%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,776 t

CO₂ emitted

5,564 t

5,651 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

38,185 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,562 h

148 days, 41% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 46.5 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−42%)

52.8Ranks 66 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 11.1 (−4%)

8.8Faster than 39% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−11%)

7.93Ranks 621 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU54%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU5%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,927 t).

Fuel burned laden

1,574 t

89% of all fuel; 11% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

266 t

4.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+87 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ORIENTAL SAKURA
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ORIENTAL SAKURA
Chemical tanker median

10.010.511.011.512.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ORIENTAL SAKURA
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−15%	−14%	−11%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+5%	+4%	+68%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−15%	−19%	+16%	+15%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+13%	+10%	−51%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−0%	+1%	+79%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−19%	−19%	−14%	−35%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	1,776	5,564	38,185	3,562	10.7	46.5	13.4	89%
2024	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	2,321	7,270	42,687	3,981	10.7	54.4	–	65%
2023	not published	1,324	4,161	25,470	2,353	10.8	52.0	19.1	–
2022	not published	1,354	4,255	22,038	1,956	11.3	61.5	16.6	87%
2021	not published	2,454	7,695	45,296	3,899	11.6	54.2	15.9	88%
2020	not published	1,371	4,299	25,250	2,214	11.4	54.3	17.8	82%
2019	not published	1,957	6,132	29,195	2,566	11.4	67.0	27.4	88%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	13.4	15.0	−11%	621 of 1,460	ClassNK	C
2024	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	19.1	16.2	+17%	756 of 1,314	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	16.6	16.1	+3%	735 of 1,409	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	15.9	16.7	−5%	623 of 1,343	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	17.8	16.2	+10%	756 of 1,312	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	27.4	17.3	+58%	1,003 of 1,321	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.