Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SC DRACO

IMO: 9752022
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 20,475 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.21 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,475 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

86.9

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+9%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (−11%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,890 t

CO₂ emitted

9,106 t

9,248 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

33,265 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,742 h

114 days, 31% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 86.9 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+9%)

52.8Ranks 911 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 11.1 (+9%)

8.8Faster than 84% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−11%)

7.93Ranks 619 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU44%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU13%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,304 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,134 t

12.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+142 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SC DRACO
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SC DRACO
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SC DRACO
Chemical tanker median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−3%	−1%	+187%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−10%	−10%	−44%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+11%	+4%	+126%	+42%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+15%	+15%	−24%	−47%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−22%	−19%	−50%	+74%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+5%	+8%	−42%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−4%	−2%	+1%	+4%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	2,890	9,106	33,265	2,742	12.1	86.9	13.4	–
2024	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	1,038	3,260	11,591	979	11.8	89.6	16.7	–
2023	not published	2,083	6,545	20,806	1,767	11.8	100	15.0	–
2022	not published	829	2,611	9,226	732	12.6	89.8	10.6	–
2021	not published	946	2,987	12,081	958	12.6	78.3	20.0	–
2020	not published	2,421	7,573	24,199	1,979	12.2	100	11.5	–
2019	not published	3,988	12,475	41,961	3,505	12.0	95.0	12.6	–
2018	not published	4,134	12,941	41,681	3,574	11.7	99.2	12.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	13.4	15.0	−11%	619 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	16.7	16.7	+0%	637 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023	not published	15.0	16.2	−7%	595 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	10.6	16.1	−34%	265 of 1,409	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	20.0	16.7	+20%	845 of 1,343	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	11.5	16.2	−29%	291 of 1,312	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	12.6	17.3	−27%	359 of 1,321	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	12.2	17.1	−29%	339 of 1,294	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.