Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTDyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 8 |
| CO₂ emitted | 53,394 t−5.7% |
| Fuel kg/nm | 76.3 |
| Average speed | 11.6 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 9.6% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD13.2 (−12% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin chemical tanker | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs chemical tanker medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD | 8 | 13.2 | −12% | 76.3 | 11.6 | 2,395 | 9.6% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD | DNV (8) | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC FALCON | 9746190 | Chemical tanker | 17.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | +19% | 11.2 | 1,550 t | €60k | €0 |
| SC MERCURY | 9746188 | Chemical tanker | 14.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | −6% | 11.6 | 3,037 t | €92k | €0 |
| SC SCORPIO | 9801079 | Chemical tanker | 13.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | −8% | 11.2 | 11,217 t | €344k | €59k |
| SC DRACO | 9752022 | Chemical tanker | 13.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | −11% | 12.1 | 9,106 t | €278k | €0 |
| SC TAURUS | 9801081 | Chemical tanker | 13.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | −14% | 11.9 | 12,345 t | €371k | €42k |
| GC SAPPHIRE | 9924924 | Chemical tanker | 12.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | −14% | 11.6 | 7,701 t | €232k | €0 |
| GC BERYL | 9924912 | Chemical tanker | 10.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | −30% | 11.7 | 5,510 t | €154k | €0 |
| SC VIRGO | 9801093 | Chemical tanker | 10.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | −32% | 10.5 | 2,926 t | €98k | €20k |
30 of 8 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.