Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SC SCORPIO

IMO: 9801079
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 20,817 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.23 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,817 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

91.8

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (−8%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,566 t

CO₂ emitted

11,217 t

11,392 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

38,822 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,461 h

144 days, 40% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 91.8 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+15%)

52.8Ranks 1,029 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 11.1 (+1%)

8.8Faster than 53% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−8%)

7.93Ranks 650 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU43%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU10%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,547 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,078 t

9.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+175 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SC SCORPIO
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SC SCORPIO
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SC SCORPIO
Chemical tanker median

7.510.012.515.017.520.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−15%	−12%	+323%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+8%	+3%	−64%	+54%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	+7%	−1%	+26%	+4%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−11%	−15%	+122%	−16%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.1 kn	+0%	+10%	−29%	−32%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	+11%	+7%	−63%	+28%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−7%	−9%	+187%	+47%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	3,566	11,217	38,822	3,461	11.2	91.8	13.9	–
2024	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	986	3,124	9,181	844	10.9	107	16.2	–
2023	not published	2,560	8,064	25,858	2,269	11.4	99.0	10.5	–
2022	not published	1,904	6,002	20,567	1,676	12.3	92.6	10.1	–
2021	not published	965	3,031	9,282	723	12.8	104	12.0	–
2020	not published	1,347	4,220	13,013	1,110	11.7	104	17.7	–
2019	not published	3,271	10,235	35,188	2,902	12.1	93.0	13.8	–
2018	not published	1,221	3,837	12,249	986	12.4	99.6	9.37	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	13.9	15.0	−8%	650 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	16.2	16.7	−3%	614 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023	not published	10.5	16.2	−35%	251 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	10.1	16.1	−37%	217 of 1,409	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	12.0	16.7	−28%	326 of 1,343	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	17.7	16.2	+9%	750 of 1,312	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	13.8	17.3	−20%	432 of 1,321	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	9.37	17.1	−45%	127 of 1,294	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.