Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SC TAURUS

IMO: 9801081
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 22,732 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.38 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 22,732 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

94.1

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+18%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (−14%)

Average speed

11.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,938 t

CO₂ emitted

12,345 t

12,539 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

41,841 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,526 h

147 days, 40% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 94.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+18%)

52.8Ranks 1,073 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 11.1 (+7%)

8.8Faster than 75% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−14%)

7.93Ranks 584 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU41%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU12%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,075 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,506 t

12.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+194 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SC TAURUS
Chemical tanker median

75.080.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SC TAURUS
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SC TAURUS
Chemical tanker median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	+5%	+9%	+16%	+11%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	+7%	−2%	+64%	−2%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.3 kn	−1%	+10%	+89%	−26%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	−8%	−16%	−47%	+42%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+2%	+4%	−40%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−3%	−3%	+84%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	+13%	+16%	−1%	+13%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	3,938	12,345	41,841	3,526	11.9	94.1	13.0	–
2024	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	3,240	10,187	36,041	3,144	11.5	89.9	11.7	–
2023	not published	1,855	5,817	22,021	1,762	12.5	84.2	12.0	–
2022	not published	994	3,111	11,647	1,040	11.2	85.3	16.1	–
2021	not published	2,051	6,505	21,995	1,809	12.2	93.2	11.4	–
2020	not published	3,346	10,505	36,573	3,081	11.9	91.5	11.4	–
2019	not published	1,881	5,890	19,847	1,674	11.9	94.8	13.9	–
2018	not published	1,674	5,256	19,978	1,725	11.6	83.8	12.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	13.0	15.0	−14%	584 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	11.7	16.7	−30%	376 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023	not published	12.0	16.2	−26%	357 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	16.1	16.1	+0%	707 of 1,409	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	11.4	16.7	−32%	287 of 1,343	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	11.4	16.2	−30%	279 of 1,312	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	13.9	17.3	−20%	436 of 1,321	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	12.3	17.1	−28%	344 of 1,294	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.