Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SC VIRGO

IMO: 9801093
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 30,265 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.22 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 30,265 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

97.9

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (−32%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

922 t

CO₂ emitted

2,926 t

2,972 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9,415 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

900 h

38 days, 10% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 97.9 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+23%)

52.8Ranks 1,136 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 11.1 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 32% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−32%)

7.93Ranks 362 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU28%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU15%

64% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,864 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

439 t

15.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+46 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SC VIRGO
Chemical tanker median

75.080.085.090.095.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SC VIRGO
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SC VIRGO
Chemical tanker median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.7 kn	+17%	+1%	−52%	−20%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−2%	+1%	+24%	−1%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−14%	−14%	+8%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	–	–	–	–	–
2020→2021	–	–	–	–	–
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	−6%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−8%	−11%	+163%	−25%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	922	2,926	9,415	900	10.5	97.9	10.3	–
2024	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	1,650	5,191	19,716	1,622	12.2	83.7	12.9	–
2023	not published	1,358	4,249	15,956	1,349	11.8	85.1	13.0	–
2022	not published	1,452	4,588	14,729	1,230	12.0	98.6	16.5	–
2021	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2020	not published	3,146	9,896	36,147	2,896	12.5	87.0	11.2	–
2019	not published	3,475	10,874	38,620	3,121	12.4	90.0	9.30	–
2018	not published	1,431	4,487	14,710	1,146	12.8	97.3	12.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	10.3	15.0	−32%	362 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	FANTASEA SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE.LTD	12.9	16.7	−23%	446 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023	not published	13.0	16.2	−20%	440 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	16.5	16.1	+3%	728 of 1,409	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	11.2	16.2	−31%	265 of 1,312	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	9.30	17.3	−46%	129 of 1,321	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	12.4	17.1	−28%	355 of 1,294	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.