Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

ALFA ALANDIA

IMO: 9752797
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 41,045 t
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.27 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Lundqvist Rederierna AB

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 41,045 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

127

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (−1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.81

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+23%)

Average speed

7.8 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−27%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,607 t

CO₂ emitted

14,623 t

14,849 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

36,317 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,656 h

194 days, 53% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 127 kg/nm · median 129 (−1%)

76.1Ranks 808 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 7.8 kn · median 10.7 (−27%)

8.0Faster than 9% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.81 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+23%)

4.51Ranks 1,044 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU28%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU17%

67% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,865 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,483 t

17.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+226 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ALFA ALANDIA
Oil tanker median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ALFA ALANDIA
Oil tanker median

2.04.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ALFA ALANDIA
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	−17%	−5%	+80%	−24%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.4 kn	+23%	+2%	−24%	+52%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	−2%	+14%	−9%	−13%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	+13%	+25%	−31%	+8%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−3%	−11%	+2%	+10%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.4 kn	−23%	+49%	+47%	−34%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−14%	−6%	+16%	+1%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Lundqvist Rederierna AB	4,607	14,623	36,317	4,656	7.8	127	9.81	–
2024	Lundqvist Rederierna AB	3,067	9,771	20,124	2,940	6.8	152	12.9	–
2023	not published	3,293	10,369	26,510	3,226	8.2	124	8.44	–
2022	not published	3,654	11,544	28,974	4,087	7.1	126	9.74	–
2021	not published	4,664	14,636	41,769	6,492	6.4	112	9.02	–
2020	not published	4,692	14,845	40,885	5,815	7.0	115	8.18	–
2019	not published	4,172	13,329	27,820	7,714	3.6	150	12.4	–
2018	not published	4,204	13,448	24,027	7,248	3.3	175	12.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Lundqvist Rederierna AB	9.81	7.95	+23%	1,044 of 1,665	DNV	B+C
2024	Lundqvist Rederierna AB	12.9	8.06	+60%	1,362 of 1,787	DNV	B
2023	not published	8.44	8.44	+0%	899 of 1,797	DNV	B
2022	not published	9.74	8.51	+14%	1,159 of 1,961	DNV	B
2021	not published	9.02	8.86	+2%	925 of 1,789	DNV	B
2020	not published	8.18	9.03	−9%	797 of 1,870	DNV	B
2019	not published	12.4	8.83	+40%	1,364 of 1,919	DNV	B
2018	not published	12.3	8.86	+39%	1,247 of 1,779	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.