Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

MAVERICK

IMO: 9762493
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 29,305 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.82 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: BULK TRADER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 29,305 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

74.8

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−9%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.03

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (+2%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,180 t

CO₂ emitted

3,710 t

3,768 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

15,767 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,560 h

65 days, 18% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 74.8 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−9%)

61.0Ranks 1,199 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 10.7 (−6%)

8.8Faster than 31% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.03 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+2%)

4.80Ranks 1,863 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU33%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU11%

59% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,195 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

416 t

11.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+58 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAVERICK
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAVERICK
Bulk carrier median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAVERICK
Bulk carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	+11%	+8%	−45%	+9%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	+9%	−1%	−15%	−14%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−25%	−22%	+57%	−45%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	+4%	+5%	+40%	+110%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+10%	+8%	−53%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.4 kn	−15%	+22%	+385%	−22%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	+2%	−1%	−71%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	1,180	3,710	15,767	1,560	10.1	74.8	8.03	–
2024	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	1,936	6,071	28,798	2,747	10.5	67.2	7.38	–
2023	not published	2,109	6,600	34,065	2,973	11.5	61.9	8.54	54%
2022	not published	1,786	5,662	21,680	1,975	11.0	82.4	15.6	48%
2021	not published	1,224	3,855	15,487	1,424	10.9	79.0	7.46	89%
2020	not published	2,365	7,496	33,066	2,969	11.1	71.5	8.47	–
2019	not published	576	1,810	6,811	880	7.7	84.6	10.9	–
2018	not published	1,927	6,031	23,254	2,906	8.0	82.9	9.65	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	8.03	7.90	+2%	1,863 of 3,611	DNV	B
2024	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	7.38	8.09	−9%	1,245 of 3,089	DNV	B
2023	not published	8.54	8.27	+3%	1,891 of 3,548	DNV	B
2022	not published	15.6	8.71	+80%	3,484 of 3,968	ABS	A
2021	not published	7.46	8.57	−13%	1,203 of 3,466	ABS	A
2020	not published	8.47	8.24	+3%	1,651 of 3,150	ABS	A
2019	not published	10.9	8.38	+30%	2,460 of 3,360	ABS	A
2018	not published	9.65	8.50	+14%	2,095 of 3,384	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.