Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

STINGER

IMO: 9762871
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 29,751 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.74 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: TRAMMO STANTON

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 29,751 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

69.5

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.36

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (−7%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,219 t

CO₂ emitted

3,842 t

3,902 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

17,546 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,488 h

62 days, 17% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 69.5 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−16%)

61.0Ranks 834 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 11.8 kn · median 10.7 (+10%)

8.8Faster than 90% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.36 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−7%)

4.80Ranks 1,560 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU20%
Into the EU65%
At berth in the EU3%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,202 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

119 t

3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+60 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STINGER
Bulk carrier median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STINGER
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STINGER
Bulk carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.8 kn	−49%	−40%	+5,030%	−57%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 49%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+97%	+99%	−98%	+124%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 97%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.0 kn	−16%	+20%	+152%	+7%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−5.5 kn	+15%	−36%	−63%	−6%	5.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	+1%	+7%	+13%	−16%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	+7%	+3%	−10%	+5%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−10%	−8%	−4%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	1,219	3,842	17,546	1,488	11.8	69.5	7.36	–
2024	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	47	146	342	34	10.0	137	17.1	–
2023	not published	1,340	4,197	19,219	1,943	9.9	69.7	7.65	–
2022	not published	631	1,977	7,614	1,097	6.9	82.8	7.14	–
2021	not published	1,479	4,685	20,535	1,653	12.4	72.0	7.63	–
2020	not published	1,289	4,046	18,103	1,543	11.7	71.2	9.08	–
2019	not published	1,333	4,176	20,067	1,653	12.1	66.4	8.63	–
2018	not published	1,539	4,810	20,869	1,740	12.0	73.8	7.88	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	7.36	7.90	−7%	1,560 of 3,611	DNV	B
2024	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	17.1	8.09	+111%	2,836 of 3,089	DNV	B
2023	not published	7.65	8.27	−7%	1,508 of 3,548	DNV	B
2022	not published	7.14	8.71	−18%	1,226 of 3,968	DNV	B
2021	not published	7.63	8.57	−11%	1,275 of 3,466	DNV	B
2020	not published	9.08	8.24	+10%	1,896 of 3,150	DNV	B
2019	not published	8.63	8.38	+3%	1,774 of 3,360	DNV	B
2018	not published	7.88	8.50	−7%	1,448 of 3,384	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.