Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

RELIABLE

IMO: 9762900
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 25,409 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.67 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,409 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

67.6

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−18%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.36

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (+6%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,530 t

CO₂ emitted

4,808 t

4,883 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

22,633 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,007 h

84 days, 23% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 67.6 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−18%)

61.0Ranks 729 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 10.7 (+6%)

8.8Faster than 75% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.36 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+6%)

4.80Ranks 2,015 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU44%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU7%

59% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,860 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

313 t

6.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+75 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

RELIABLE
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

RELIABLE
Bulk carrier median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

RELIABLE
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+5%	+8%	+8%	−12%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	−5%	−11%	+64%	+23%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−2%	−2%	−44%	−35%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	+2%	+7%	+536%	−17%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.8 kn	−1%	−15%	−75%	+45%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.8 kn	+3%	+20%	−47%	+6%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.7 kn	−8%	−20%	+112%	−27%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	1,530	4,808	22,633	2,007	11.3	67.6	8.36	–
2024	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	1,342	4,209	20,877	1,896	11.0	64.3	9.47	–
2023	not published	866	2,720	12,721	1,086	11.7	68.0	7.73	–
2022	not published	1,591	5,001	22,813	1,968	11.6	69.7	11.8	–
2021	not published	246	775	3,589	326	11.0	68.5	14.2	–
2020	not published	1,003	3,144	14,445	1,127	12.8	69.5	9.80	–
2019	not published	1,842	5,770	27,255	2,470	11.0	67.6	9.22	–
2018	not published	942	2,955	12,854	1,009	12.7	73.3	12.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	8.36	7.90	+6%	2,015 of 3,611	DNV	B
2024	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	9.47	8.09	+17%	1,999 of 3,089	DNV	B
2023	not published	7.73	8.27	−7%	1,540 of 3,548	DNV	B
2022	not published	11.8	8.71	+36%	2,964 of 3,968	DNV	B
2021	not published	14.2	8.57	+66%	3,033 of 3,466	DNV	B
2020	not published	9.80	8.24	+19%	2,111 of 3,150	DNV	B
2019	not published	9.22	8.38	+10%	2,003 of 3,360	DNV	B
2018	not published	12.7	8.50	+49%	2,785 of 3,384	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.