Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

LAOURA

IMO: 9762912
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 27,702 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.73 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: TRAMMO LAOURA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,702 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

66.7

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.63

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (−3%)

Average speed

9.7 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

690 t

CO₂ emitted

2,188 t

2,222 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

10,352 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,067 h

44 days, 12% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 66.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−19%)

61.0Ranks 675 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 9.7 kn · median 10.7 (−9%)

8.8Faster than 21% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.63 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−3%)

4.80Ranks 1,683 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU57%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU5%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,238 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

108 t

4.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+34 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LAOURA
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LAOURA
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LAOURA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+4%	+1%	+70%	−54%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	+0%	−9%	−73%	+65%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023	−1.7 kn	−12%	−23%	+24%	+13%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.0 kn	+1%	+19%	+31%	+0%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.0 kn	+13%	+3%	+88%	+37%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.2 kn	−14%	−4%	−34%	−33%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	690	2,188	10,352	1,067	9.7	66.7	7.63	–
2024	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	389	1,227	6,072	608	10.0	64.1	16.6	–
2023	not published	1,435	4,521	22,404	2,029	11.0	64.0	10.1	–
2021	not published	1,321	4,186	18,117	1,430	12.7	72.9	8.91	–
2020	not published	1,000	3,139	13,786	1,292	10.7	72.5	8.87	–
2019	not published	471	1,479	7,340	625	11.7	64.2	6.46	–
2018	not published	830	2,613	11,151	1,062	10.5	74.5	9.67	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	7.63	7.90	−3%	1,683 of 3,611	DNV	B
2024	GOLDENPORT SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.	16.6	8.09	+105%	2,820 of 3,089	DNV	B
2023	not published	10.1	8.27	+22%	2,384 of 3,548	DNV	B
2021	not published	8.91	8.57	+4%	1,879 of 3,466	DNV	B
2020	not published	8.87	8.24	+8%	1,818 of 3,150	DNV	B
2019	not published	6.46	8.38	−23%	860 of 3,360	DNV	B
2018	not published	9.67	8.50	+14%	2,098 of 3,384	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.