Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ORIENTAL COSMOS

IMO: 9800049
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 10,388 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 8.65 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,388 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

48.1

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−40%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (−4%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

13.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,882 t

CO₂ emitted

9,003 t

9,145 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

59,939 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,291 h

220 days, 60% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 48.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−40%)

52.8Ranks 82 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 11.1 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 57% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−4%)

7.93Ranks 695 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU26%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU7%

62% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,550 t).

Fuel burned laden

2,649 t

92% of all fuel; 8% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

601 t

6.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+142 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ORIENTAL COSMOS
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ORIENTAL COSMOS
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ORIENTAL COSMOS
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.030.035.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−8%	−4%	+2%	–	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−6%	−9%	+71%	–	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−8%	−11%	+12%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+4%	+1%	+9%	−4%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.6 kn	+9%	+26%	+18%	−10%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.8 kn	−6%	−26%	+236%	−43%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	2,882	9,003	59,939	5,291	11.3	48.1	14.5	92%
2024	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	3,075	9,648	58,612	5,375	10.9	52.5	–	90%
2023	not published	1,921	6,028	34,361	3,044	11.3	55.9	15.4	–
2022	not published	1,863	5,841	30,701	2,643	11.6	60.7	16.5	73%
2021	not published	1,646	5,166	28,115	2,363	11.9	58.5	17.2	77%
2020	not published	1,287	4,040	23,876	2,325	10.3	53.9	19.0	88%
2019	not published	406	1,273	7,104	542	13.1	57.1	33.1	89%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	14.5	15.0	−4%	695 of 1,460	ClassNK	B
2024	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B
2023	not published	15.4	16.2	−5%	610 of 1,314	ClassNK	B
2022	not published	16.5	16.1	+2%	727 of 1,409	ClassNK	B
2021	not published	17.2	16.7	+3%	709 of 1,343	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	19.0	16.2	+18%	819 of 1,312	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	33.1	17.3	+91%	1,085 of 1,321	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.