Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

INTERMEZZO

IMO: 9804825
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 22,730 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEDI 5.18 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TM SHIPMANAGEMENT CO., LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 22,730 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

82.3

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (−24%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,809 t

CO₂ emitted

5,690 t

5,779 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

21,977 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,803 h

75 days, 21% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 82.3 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+3%)

52.8Ranks 802 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 11.1 (+10%)

8.8Faster than 85% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−24%)

7.93Ranks 445 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU39%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU8%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,423 t).

Fuel burned laden

1,525 t

84% of all fuel; 16% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

447 t

7.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+89 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

INTERMEZZO
Chemical tanker median

75.080.085.090.095.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

INTERMEZZO
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

INTERMEZZO
Chemical tanker median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−8%	−2%	−44%	+11%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	−2%	+4%	+19%	−9%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+8%	+7%	+18%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−5%	−6%	−17%	+14%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+10%	+3%	−10%	+13%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−9%	−10%	+167%	−19%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TM SHIPMANAGEMENT CO., LTD.	1,809	5,690	21,977	1,803	12.2	82.3	11.4	84%
2024	TM SHIPMANAGEMENT CO., LTD.	3,476	10,901	39,042	3,372	11.6	89.0	10.2	88%
2023	not published	2,965	9,301	32,767	2,988	11.0	90.5	11.2	–
2022	not published	2,345	7,356	27,885	2,518	11.1	84.1	12.3	64%
2021	not published	2,950	9,263	33,419	2,970	11.3	88.3	10.8	84%
2020	not published	2,969	9,292	36,939	3,072	12.0	80.4	9.52	85%
2019	not published	1,217	3,817	13,846	1,138	12.2	87.9	11.8	83%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TM SHIPMANAGEMENT CO., LTD.	11.4	15.0	−24%	445 of 1,460	ClassNK	B
2024	TM SHIPMANAGEMENT CO., LTD.	10.2	16.7	−39%	264 of 1,274	ClassNK	B
2023	not published	11.2	16.2	−31%	306 of 1,314	ClassNK	B
2022	not published	12.3	16.1	−24%	424 of 1,409	ClassNK	B
2021	not published	10.8	16.7	−35%	240 of 1,343	ClassNK	B
2020	not published	9.52	16.2	−41%	144 of 1,312	ClassNK	B
2019	not published	11.8	17.3	−32%	301 of 1,321	ClassNK	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.