Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

THUN LIDKOPING

IMO: 9828974
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 7,224 t
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Delfzijl
Technical efficiency: EEDI 6.86 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,224 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

61.8

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−22%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

27.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+79%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

332 t

CO₂ emitted

1,047 t

1,063 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

5,370 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

522 h

22 days, 6% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 61.8 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−22%)

52.8Ranks 299 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 11.1 (−7%)

8.8Faster than 29% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 27.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+79%)

7.93Ranks 1,123 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU32%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU23%

66% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (686 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

238 t

22.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+16 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

THUN LIDKOPING
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

THUN LIDKOPING
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

THUN LIDKOPING
Chemical tanker median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−1%	+2%	−48%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	−15%	−6%	−31%	−10%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+2%	−1%	+69%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.9 kn	+1%	+11%	+13%	+0%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−1%	−1%	−69%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+1.8 kn	+0%	+28%	+37%	+63%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.	332	1,047	5,370	522	10.3	61.8	27.0	–
2024	MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.	645	2,043	10,351	1,029	10.1	62.3	28.1	–
2023	not published	1,093	3,446	14,957	1,650	9.1	73.1	31.2	–
2022	not published	636	2,002	8,853	957	9.3	71.8	30.6	–
2021	not published	557	1,758	7,806	931	8.4	71.3	30.6	–
2020	not published	1,831	5,776	25,393	3,009	8.4	72.1	30.8	–
2019	not published	1,331	4,189	18,544	2,810	6.6	71.8	18.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.	27.0	15.0	+79%	1,123 of 1,460	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.	28.1	16.7	+68%	953 of 1,274	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	31.2	16.2	+92%	1,045 of 1,314	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	30.6	16.1	+91%	1,140 of 1,409	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	30.6	16.7	+83%	1,070 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	30.8	16.2	+90%	1,059 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	18.9	17.3	+9%	750 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.