Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.your view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 8 |
| CO₂ emitted | 27,895 t |
| Fuel kg/nm | 46.3 |
| Average speed | 10.0 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 13.3% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | General cargo |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 19.3
- MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.23.6 (+23% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin general cargo | CO₂ per transport work (dwt)g/dwt·nm, median ship | vs general cargo medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V. | 3 | 23.6 | +23% | 38.3 | 10.3 | 4,463 | 5.5% | – |
| Segment median | 19.3 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.28.9 (+73% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Shipsin chemical tanker | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship | vs chemical tanker medianlower is better | Fuel kg/nmfleet avg. | Average speedknots at sea | Hours at seaper ship per year | CO₂ at berthshare | LNG / alt. fuelships | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V. | 5 | 28.9 | +73% | 68.2 | 9.1 | 1,116 | 25.4% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V. | Bureau Veritas (8) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Average speed | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THUN LIFFEY | 9829007 | Chemical tanker | 30.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | +81% | 8.2 | 4,052 t | €80k | €17k |
| THUN LUNDY | 9837872 | Chemical tanker | 30.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | +81% | 9.6 | 1,611 t | €32k | €7k |
| THUN LIVERPOOL | 9828998 | Chemical tanker | 28.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | +73% | 10.0 | 2,250 t | €46k | €8k |
| THUN LIDKOPING | 9828974 | Chemical tanker | 28.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | +68% | 10.1 | 2,043 t | €48k | €8k |
| VESTANHAV | 9504152 | General cargo | 27.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 19.3 | +41% | 11.0 | 6,086 t | €183k | €53k |
| THUN LONDON | 9828986 | Chemical tanker | 23.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | +40% | 9.0 | 1,010 t | €21k | €0 |
| KALKVIK | 9341172 | General cargo | 23.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 19.3 | +23% | 10.1 | 6,596 t | €172k | €32k |
| SUNNANHAV | 9341160 | General cargo | 22.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 19.3 | +15% | 9.8 | 4,247 t | €111k | €14k |
30 of 8 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.