Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

THUN LIVERPOOL

IMO: 9828998
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 7,159 t
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Delfzijl
Technical efficiency: EEDI 6.86 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,159 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

62.7

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−21%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

27.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+84%)

Average speed

9.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

14.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,376 t

CO₂ emitted

4,335 t

4,403 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

21,934 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,225 h

93 days, 25% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 62.7 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−21%)

52.8Ranks 326 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 9.9 kn · median 11.1 (−11%)

8.8Faster than 21% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 27.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+84%)

7.93Ranks 1,139 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU35%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU31%

65% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,836 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,337 t

30.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+68 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

THUN LIVERPOOL
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

THUN LIVERPOOL
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

THUN LIVERPOOL
Chemical tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−7%	−9%	+108%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−13%	−11%	+38%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+2%	+1%	+27%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	+7%	+19%	−17%	−18%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−2%	−1%	−69%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	+42%	+31%	+151%	+243%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 42%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.	1,376	4,335	21,934	2,225	9.9	62.7	27.6	–
2024	MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.	712	2,250	10,533	1,056	10.0	67.6	28.9	–
2023	not published	593	1,868	7,651	780	9.8	77.5	31.7	–
2022	not published	459	1,448	6,020	614	9.8	76.3	30.2	–
2021	not published	518	1,636	7,264	823	8.8	71.3	36.7	–
2020	not published	1,680	5,303	23,138	2,629	8.8	72.6	32.9	–
2019	not published	471	1,471	9,229	969	9.5	51.0	9.61	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.	27.6	15.0	+84%	1,139 of 1,460	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	MARIN SHIP MANAGEMENT B.V.	28.9	16.7	+73%	964 of 1,274	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	31.7	16.2	+96%	1,050 of 1,314	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	30.2	16.1	+88%	1,134 of 1,409	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	36.7	16.7	+120%	1,154 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	32.9	16.2	+104%	1,089 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	9.61	17.3	−45%	153 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.