Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ORIENTAL TULIP

IMO: 9890549
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 6,935 t
Flag (estimated): Panama (from the 2024 report)
Technical efficiency: EEDI 9.91 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,935 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

55.6

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−30%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.0 (+67%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

13.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,117 t

CO₂ emitted

9,800 t

9,953 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

56,094 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,423 h

226 days, 62% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 55.6 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−30%)

52.8Ranks 185 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 11.1 (−7%)

8.8Faster than 30% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 25.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+67%)

7.93Ranks 1,088 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports39%
From the EU19%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU6%

59% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,757 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

614 t

6.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+153 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ORIENTAL TULIP
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ORIENTAL TULIP
Chemical tanker median

10.012.014.016.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ORIENTAL TULIP
Chemical tanker median

15.020.025.030.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−14%	−14%	+76%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	+22%	+8%	−13%	–	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−31%	−33%	+17%	−26%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	+19%	+7%	−31%	−5%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	−3%	−12%	+465%	+40%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	3,117	9,800	56,094	5,423	10.3	55.6	25.2	–
2024	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	2,067	6,497	31,939	3,099	10.3	64.7	–	61%
2023	not published	1,952	6,123	36,737	3,164	11.6	53.1	15.6	–
2022	not published	2,441	7,653	31,525	2,666	11.8	77.4	21.0	69%
2021	not published	2,993	9,387	45,864	3,510	13.1	65.3	22.2	71%
2020	not published	548	1,710	8,115	564	14.4	67.6	15.8	96%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	25.2	15.0	+67%	1,088 of 1,460	ClassNK	C
2024	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	15.6	16.2	−4%	619 of 1,314	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	21.0	16.1	+31%	933 of 1,409	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	22.2	16.7	+33%	916 of 1,343	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	15.8	16.2	−2%	630 of 1,312	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.