Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

Gazocean SA
Ships8
CO₂ emitted94 kt
Fuel per mile147 kg/nm
Average speed13.6 kn
CO₂ at berth4.0%
Ships burning LNG6
Main segmentLNG carrier

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

LNG carrier

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.4

  • Gazocean SA5.9 (−20%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Gazocean SA65.9−20%17214.81,8873.7%6
Segment median 7.40%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.8

  • Gazocean SA18.8 (−48%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Gazocean SA218.8−48%8111.32,7905.5%–
Segment median 35.80%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Gazocean SAVerifavia (8)13%75%100%0%

Gazocean SA: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
LNG ADVENTURELNG9870159LNG carrier11.4 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+54%15.410,811 t€165k
ELISA AQUILALNG9884473LNG carrier7.2 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−2%14.410,512 t€161k
BORDA9772826Gas carrier (LPG)20.6 g CO₂/t·nm21.8−6%12.45,825 t€68k
LNG ENDURANCELNG9874492LNG carrier6.0 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−19%15.78,086 t€171k
ELISA LARUSLNG9852975LNG carrier5.8 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−22%14.920,686 t€320k
LA CONDAMINE9941324Gas carrier (LPG)17.0 g CO₂/t·nm21.8−22%10.99,989 t€159k
LNG ENTERPRISELNG9874480LNG carrier4.5 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−39%14.212,331 t€189k
LNG ENDEAVOURLNG9893606LNG carrier4.4 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−41%14.516,035 t€249k

30 of 8 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.