Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- LSCyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| LSC | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 29 |
| CO₂ emitted | 175 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 102 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.0 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 6.2% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Oil tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- LSC6.4 (−21% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG / alt. fuel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSC | 12 | 6.4 | −21% | 116 | 11.0 | 1,963 | 6.7% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- LSC9.2 (−45% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG / alt. fuel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSC | 13 | 9.2 | −45% | 91 | 11.2 | 1,778 | 6.1% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Gas carrier (LPG)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.8
- LSC13.8 (−61% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG / alt. fuel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSC | 4 | 13.8 | −61% | 91 | 9.8 | 1,231 | 3.7% | – |
| Segment median | 35.8 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
LSC: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASPHALT SPLENDOR | 9763332 | Oil tanker | 24.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +209% | 7.3 | 2,711 t | €42k | €0 |
| BELGRAVIA V | 9341897 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 79.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.8 | +121% | 6.4 | 3,504 t | €63k | €11k |
| ASPHALT SYNERGY | 9794159 | Oil tanker | 17.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +114% | 10.6 | 12,118 t | €312k | €0 |
| SV WAKILI | 9590711 | Oil tanker | 9.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +19% | 11.9 | 7,728 t | €95k | €0 |
| ISABELLA M II | 9836440 | Chemical tanker | 17.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | +4% | 11.6 | 2,820 t | €43k | €0 |
| ELANDRA MELODY | 9676527 | Chemical tanker | 16.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | 0% | 10.5 | 8,128 t | €137k | €2k |
| ELANDRA BAY | 9821691 | Oil tanker | 7.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −2% | 11.2 | 4,928 t | €86k | €0 |
| ELANDRA EAGLE | 9792474 | Oil tanker | 6.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −17% | 11.1 | 6,348 t | €98k | €0 |
| ELANDRA SOUND | 9821706 | Oil tanker | 6.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −21% | 11.2 | 9,836 t | €155k | €0 |
| ELANDRA GULF | 9749544 | Oil tanker | 6.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −21% | 11.2 | 8,680 t | €143k | €1k |
| ELANDRA SEA | 9635779 | Chemical tanker | 12.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | −27% | 11.1 | 4,799 t | €82k | €2k |
| UZAVA | 9323388 | Chemical tanker | 11.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | −33% | 10.9 | 11,383 t | €232k | €54k |
| ELANDRA OAK | 9509449 | Chemical tanker | 11.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | −34% | 12.1 | 1,587 t | €25k | €0 |
| ELANDRA STAR | 9635767 | Chemical tanker | 10.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | −40% | 9.9 | 1,433 t | €23k | €0 |
| ELANDRA BALTIC | 9482562 | Chemical tanker | 9.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | −45% | 11.5 | 9,491 t | €169k | €12k |
| AINAZI | 9323405 | Chemical tanker | 8.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | −47% | 11.5 | 7,991 t | €149k | €5k |
| DIAS I | 9858474 | Oil tanker | 4.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −47% | 12.3 | 6,156 t | €101k | €0 |
| SALACGRIVA | 9323390 | Chemical tanker | 8.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | −49% | 11.0 | 11,872 t | €194k | €0 |
| ELANDRA FJORD | 9482550 | Chemical tanker | 8.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | −50% | 11.5 | 4,812 t | €75k | €0 |
| ELANDRA SWIFT | 9945306 | Oil tanker | 3.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −51% | 12.0 | 7,675 t | €123k | €0 |
| PIS PRECIOUS | 9689158 | Chemical tanker | 8.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | −51% | 12.1 | 7,784 t | €126k | €0 |
| ELANDRA SWALLOW | 9945291 | Oil tanker | 3.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −54% | 11.6 | 6,627 t | €108k | €0 |
| ELANDRA FALCON | 9792486 | Oil tanker | 3.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −57% | 11.0 | 13,258 t | €215k | €0 |
| VIVIT FORNAX | 9835185 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 15.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.8 | −58% | 15.1 | 3,867 t | €59k | €0 |
| ELANDRA REDWOOD | 9834337 | Chemical tanker | 6.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | −63% | 10.1 | 1,599 t | €32k | €0 |
| ELANDRA WILLOW | 9834349 | Chemical tanker | 6.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.7 | −63% | 10.9 | 580 t | €9k | €0 |
| VIVIT THUBAN | 9840867 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 12.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.8 | −65% | 15.2 | 4,791 t | €76k | €0 |
| VIVIT ALTAIS | 9840879 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 8.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.8 | −77% | 15.9 | 1,677 t | €25k | €0 |
30 of 29 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.