Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limitedyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limited | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 17 |
| CO₂ emitted | 102 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 111 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.0 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 3.2% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Bulk carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limited7.7 (−5% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG / alt. fuel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limited | 15 | 7.7 | −5% | 112 | 10.9 | 1,577 | 2.9% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limited5.8 (−28% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG / alt. fuel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limited | 2 | 5.8 | −28% | 105 | 11.7 | 1,503 | 5.6% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limited | Bureau Veritas (17) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Wah Kwong Ship Management (Hong Kong) Limited: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHAILEASE BRIGHT | 9642485 | Bulk carrier | 11.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +36% | 11.3 | 3,009 t | €46k | €12k |
| CSSC CAPE TOWN | 9853888 | Bulk carrier | 8.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +10% | 11.1 | 10,158 t | €157k | €39k |
| JY LAKE | 9845257 | Bulk carrier | 8.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +6% | 11.3 | 3,656 t | €55k | €12k |
| JY RIVER | 9845269 | Bulk carrier | 8.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +4% | 11.0 | 2,913 t | €46k | €10k |
| LIGHT VENTURE | 9868895 | Bulk carrier | 8.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | 0% | 11.5 | 2,599 t | €42k | €8k |
| BRIGHT VENTURE | 9868883 | Bulk carrier | 8.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | 0% | 11.3 | 3,344 t | €51k | €0 |
| CSSC IMMINGHAM | 9853929 | Bulk carrier | 7.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −3% | 11.2 | 6,894 t | €106k | €16k |
| BBG GRACE | 9702704 | Bulk carrier | 7.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −5% | 11.8 | 2,460 t | €0 | €0 |
| BBG NOVA | 9705342 | Bulk carrier | 7.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −9% | 10.8 | 8,766 t | €46k | €4k |
| VICTORY VENTURE | 9773040 | Oil tanker | 7.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −10% | 12.1 | 7,045 t | €111k | €0 |
| CSSC ROTTERDAM | 9853905 | Bulk carrier | 6.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −16% | 11.0 | 3,767 t | €58k | €1k |
| CSSC GLADSTONE | 9853917 | Bulk carrier | 6.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −24% | 11.5 | 3,563 t | €55k | €11k |
| BBG HONOR | 9702716 | Bulk carrier | 6.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −25% | 11.6 | 3,628 t | €27k | €0 |
| CSSC AMSTERDAM | 9853890 | Bulk carrier | 4.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −40% | 11.9 | 7,964 t | €122k | €0 |
| CSSC LE HAVRE | 9853931 | Bulk carrier | 4.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −44% | 9.8 | 14,019 t | €223k | €0 |
| TENACITY VENTURE | 9773052 | Oil tanker | 4.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −46% | 11.2 | 4,618 t | €74k | €0 |
| CS NAN JING | 9874698 | Bulk carrier | 3.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −54% | 10.0 | 13,314 t | €213k | €0 |
30 of 17 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.