Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KGyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KG | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 6 |
| CO₂ emitted | 86 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 84 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 12.9 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 5.2% |
| Ships burning LNG | 6 |
| Ships using alternative fuel | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KG27.8 (+59% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG / alt. fuel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KG | 6 | 27.8 | +59% | 84 | 12.9 | 4,652 | 5.2% | 6 / 0 |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KG | ABS (6) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KG: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Segment median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances | Cost of gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTAINERSHIPS ARCTICLNG | 9818400 | Container | 31.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +78% | 12.7 | 13,263 t | €287k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS NORDLNG | 9813993 | Container | 29.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +66% | 12.6 | 13,982 t | €283k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS AURORALNG | 9814014 | Container | 28.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +62% | 12.9 | 13,965 t | €299k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS POLARLNG | 9814002 | Container | 27.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +56% | 12.6 | 12,698 t | €248k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS STELLARLNG | 9866251 | Container | 24.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +39% | 13.3 | 16,587 t | €395k | €0 |
| CONTAINERSHIPS BOREALISLNG | 9866249 | Container | 23.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 17.5 | +31% | 13.0 | 15,517 t | €359k | €0 |
30 of 6 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.