Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- COSCO Shippingyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| COSCO Shipping | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 311 |
| CO₂ emitted | 4.1 Mt |
| Fuel per mile | 220 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 13.7 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.3% |
| Ships burning LNG | 4 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- COSCO Shipping8.4 (−52% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSCO Shipping | 67 | 8.4 | −52% | 273 | 15.1 | 4,027 | 1.8% | – |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- COSCO Shipping7.8 (−4% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSCO Shipping | 153 | 7.8 | −4% | 87 | 11.2 | 1,046 | 4.2% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- COSCO Shipping5.8 (−29% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSCO Shipping | 22 | 5.8 | −29% | 113 | 10.4 | 2,092 | 8.8% | 1 |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 19.3
- COSCO Shipping6.6 (−66% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSCO Shipping | 48 | 6.6 | −66% | 78 | 12.0 | 1,542 | 4.3% | – |
| Segment median | 19.3 | 0% |
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.4
- COSCO Shipping7.7 (+5% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSCO Shipping | 3 | 7.7 | +5% | 223 | 15.6 | 1,760 | 0.0% | 3 |
| Segment median | 7.4 | 0% |
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.3
- COSCO Shipping47.0 (−15% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSCO Shipping | 3 | 47.0 | −15% | 97 | 14.3 | 2,069 | 0.8% | – |
| Segment median | 55.3 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSCO Shipping | China Classification Society (281), ABS (28), Lloyd's Register (2) | 100% | 7% | 9% | 0% |
COSCO Shipping: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZHEN HUA 33 | 9808223 | Other | 110 g CO₂/t·nm | 31.6 | +248% | 9.7 | 7,617 t | €116k |
| NING HAI WAN | 9578385 | Oil tanker | 77.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +209% | 10.4 | 6,358 t | €172k |
| AN HAI WAN | 9563108 | Oil tanker | 75.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +199% | 10.3 | 5,951 t | €147k |
| PING HAI WAN | 9558579 | Oil tanker | 65.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +159% | 10.5 | 4,661 t | €118k |
| SHENG HUA WAN | 9814416 | Oil tanker | 61.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +142% | 11.4 | 3,716 t | €86k |
| ZHI YUAN KOU | 9639452 | Other | 55.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 24.4 | +129% | 9.6 | 4,610 t | €69k |
| KANG SHENG KOU | 9223289 | Other | 69.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 31.6 | +118% | 9.6 | 9,547 t | €189k |
| XING HAI WAN | 9570113 | Oil tanker | 54.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +116% | 10.5 | 5,823 t | €132k |
| XIANG RUI KOU | 9483102 | Other | 62.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 31.6 | +96% | 11.1 | 9,450 t | €145k |
| TAI HUA WAN | 9814387 | Oil tanker | 48.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +90% | 11.5 | 6,542 t | €152k |
| JIN YUAN LING | 9487081 | Bulk carrier | 23.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +51% | 9.9 | 2,205 t | €51k |
| SHENG CHENG HAI | 9505481 | Bulk carrier | 7.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.9 | +47% | 9.5 | 1,264 t | €22k |
| FU RONG FENG | 9523184 | Bulk carrier | 22.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +47% | 11.1 | 2,460 t | €45k |
| XIN SHANGHAI | 9307231 | Container | 31.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +46% | 15.8 | 14,255 t | €219k |
| WU YI HAI | 9488217 | Bulk carrier | 9.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.7 | +43% | 10.8 | 2,204 t | €35k |
| CSCL JUPITER | 9467263 | Container | 9.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +39% | 13.6 | 53,401 t | €859k |
| RED ZED I | 9633977 | Other | 33.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 24.4 | +36% | 8.7 | 16,173 t | €256k |
| CSCL VENUS | 9467251 | Container | 9.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +33% | 15.2 | 85,646 t | €1.3m |
| COSCO TAIHANGSHAN | 9418327 | Bulk carrier | 12.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.7 | +32% | 8.8 | 1,593 t | €24k |
| CSCL ARCTIC OCEAN | 9695169 | Container | 9.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +29% | 16.6 | 91,782 t | €1.5m |
| YUE GUAN FENG | 9523158 | Bulk carrier | 8.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.7 | +28% | 9.5 | 2,937 t | €47k |
| CI YUN SHAN | 9592886 | Bulk carrier | 8.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.7 | +28% | 10.1 | 1,294 t | €28k |
| QU SHAN HAI | 9454668 | Bulk carrier | 8.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.7 | +27% | 10.5 | 3,210 t | €49k |
| NING YUE HAI | 9751339 | Bulk carrier | 10.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +27% | 12.4 | 1,811 t | €27k |
| CSCL STAR | 9466867 | Container | 8.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +25% | 15.0 | 59,990 t | €845k |
| OOCL SWEDEN | 9922603 | Container | 8.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +24% | 14.8 | 25,235 t | €430k |
| DE XIN HAI | 9364758 | Bulk carrier | 6.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.9 | +23% | 10.2 | 307 t | €5k |
| YAN DANG HAI | 9488229 | Bulk carrier | 8.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.7 | +23% | 11.1 | 5,053 t | €86k |
| WEN ZHU HAI | 9488475 | Bulk carrier | 5.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.9 | +20% | 10.9 | 5,092 t | €84k |
| DA HONG XIA | 9451355 | Other | 148 g CO₂/t·nm | 124 | +19% | 11.3 | 226 t | €0 |
30 of 317 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.