Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

Valloeby
Ships22
CO₂ emitted121 kt
Fuel per mile84 kg/nm
Average speed8.6 kn
CO₂ at berth10.5%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentOil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • Valloeby19.8 (+145%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Valloeby919.8+145%1008.92,88711.1%–
Segment median 8.10%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

  • Valloeby61.4 (+267%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Valloeby1361.4+267%718.43,1259.7%–
Segment median 16.70%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
ValloebyDNV (21), Polish Register of Shipping (1)45%55%0%0%

Valloeby: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
VS LARA9309148Chemical tanker97.1 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+136%6.84,976 t€98k
LAMENTIN9377054Chemical tanker83.0 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+101%9.05,143 t€111k
COLORADO STAR9527609Oil tanker48.0 g CO₂/t·nm25.2+90%8.36,653 t€161k
HELLESPONT PROGRESS9351426Oil tanker18.6 g CO₂/t·nm9.9+88%11.06,185 t€95k
GANGES STAR9496692Oil tanker41.4 g CO₂/t·nm25.2+64%9.17,295 t€190k
MISSISSIPPI STAR9527623Chemical tanker66.4 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+61%7.52,644 t€53k
HELLESPONT PRIDE9351414Oil tanker15.9 g CO₂/t·nm9.9+60%10.85,163 t€84k
AMUR STAR9480368Chemical tanker64.1 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+55%9.35,406 t€127k
LASCAUX9405746Chemical tanker61.4 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+49%7.88,042 t€131k
PECHORA STAR9488322Chemical tanker53.2 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+29%7.66,899 t€167k
MURRAY STAR9527635Chemical tanker49.6 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+20%8.85,610 t€119k
KONGO STAR9508823Chemical tanker48.4 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+18%9.47,595 t€184k
SHANNON STAR9503926Chemical tanker46.5 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+13%9.76,942 t€170k
HELLESPONT PROMISE9351438Oil tanker9.4 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−5%11.711,328 t€179k
VS LEIA9303730Oil tanker22.0 g CO₂/t·nm25.2−13%8.49,855 t€219k
VS SPIRIT9339636Oil tanker20.9 g CO₂/t·nm25.2−17%7.18,186 t€142k
VS LISBETH9309978Oil tanker18.6 g CO₂/t·nm25.2−26%8.710,000 t€234k

30 of 22 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.