Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

Wallem
Ships19
CO₂ emitted160 kt
Fuel per mile121 kg/nm
Average speed11.9 kn
CO₂ at berth3.9%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentOil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • Wallem4.8 (−40%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Wallem104.8−40%12910.81,8216.9%–
Segment median 8.10%

Vehicle carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.3

  • Wallem181 (+228%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Wallem6181+228%10416.31,7500.4%–
Segment median 55.30%

Reefer

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 58.7

  • Wallem76.6 (+30%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Wallem276.6+30%10314.41,2631.7%–
Segment median 58.70%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
WallemABS (15), ClassNK (4)79%5%21%0%

Wallem: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
LIAO HE KOU9991757Vehicle carrier305 g CO₂/t·nm158+93%16.48,756 t€140k
COOL ROYAL9172959Reefer61.4 g CO₂/t·nm47.0+30%17.27,058 t€109k
COOL MAGNUS9167801Reefer91.8 g CO₂/t·nm74.4+23%11.54,662 t€73k
SONANGOL CABINDA9575589Oil tanker5.0 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+10%11.33,716 t€71k
SONANGOL PORTO AMBOIM9575577Oil tanker4.7 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+5%10.46,851 t€107k
MIN JIANG KOU9991771Vehicle carrier57.7 g CO₂/t·nm55.3+4%16.19,035 t€140k
SONANGOL RANGEL9575541Oil tanker4.3 g CO₂/t·nm4.5−5%11.61,347 t€20k
SONANGOL CAZENGA9766310Oil tanker4.2 g CO₂/t·nm4.5−7%11.67,818 t€124k
SONANGOL HUILA9575565Oil tanker5.7 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−10%11.412,518 t€136k
POSILLIPO9389849Oil tanker7.3 g CO₂/t·nm8.4−13%11.16,553 t€78k
SONANGOL NAMIBE9325049Oil tanker7.3 g CO₂/t·nm8.4−14%10.47,603 t€120k
SONANGOL KULUMBIMBI9938482Oil tanker3.9 g CO₂/t·nm4.5−14%10.514,305 t€234k
SONANGOL MAIOMBE9766322Oil tanker4.9 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−23%10.312,868 t€215k
SONANGOL NJINGA MBANDE9938494Oil tanker4.5 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−29%10.75,908 t€96k

30 of 19 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.