Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

Zodiac
Ships69
CO₂ emitted1.0 Mt
Fuel per mile166 kg/nm
Average speed12.8 kn
CO₂ at berth3.5%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentContainer

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5

  • Zodiac7.2 (−59%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Zodiac147.2−59%24615.53,2111.5%–
Segment median 17.50%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • Zodiac7.2 (−10%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Zodiac207.2−10%15610.52,7457.5%–
Segment median 8.10%

Vehicle carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.3

  • Zodiac50.1 (−9%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Zodiac1150.1−9%11215.31,8382.3%–
Segment median 55.30%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • Zodiac4.7 (−42%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Zodiac104.7−42%1189.81,4831.6%–
Segment median 8.10%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

  • Zodiac13.9 (−17%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Zodiac813.9−17%6912.32,2175.1%–
Segment median 16.70%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.8

  • Zodiac15.6 (−56%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Zodiac515.6−56%11313.81,0997.6%–
Segment median 35.80%

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 19.3

  • Zodiac11.0 (−43%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Zodiac111.0−43%717.71,6213.6%–
Segment median 19.30%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
ZodiacABS (67), ICS Verification Services (2)3%0%97%0%

Zodiac: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
IC PROGRESS9611577Bulk carrier34.0 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+124%8.52,887 t€45k
GOLD XING9308807Vehicle carrier308 g CO₂/t·nm158+94%13.77,555 t€120k
HOLSATIA9233856Container40.1 g CO₂/t·nm21.8+84%14.611,404 t€194k
THRUXTON9782089Vehicle carrier84.9 g CO₂/t·nm55.3+53%16.819,884 t€135k
STANLEY PARK9363845Chemical tanker31.8 g CO₂/t·nm23.7+34%11.52,174 t€48k
BLUE NOVA9534846Oil tanker5.9 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+32%10.628,525 t€479k
CHESHIRE9369772Gas carrier (LPG)27.8 g CO₂/t·nm21.8+27%13.04,987 t€91k
AZURE NOVA9602631Oil tanker5.6 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+24%11.821,139 t€350k
WHITE MOON9588158Oil tanker7.6 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+21%9.914,182 t€242k
CAPRICORN SUN9333785Oil tanker10.1 g CO₂/t·nm8.4+20%10.42,366 t€38k
RED MOON9590307Oil tanker7.5 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+19%11.44,414 t€73k
GEMINI SUN9343340Oil tanker9.5 g CO₂/t·nm8.4+13%8.619,986 t€349k
HANOVER SQUARE9783992Oil tanker7.1 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+12%10.914,727 t€250k
PLUTO MOON9784025Oil tanker7.0 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+11%11.212,827 t€209k
DORSET9470088Gas carrier (LPG)16.5 g CO₂/t·nm15.0+10%13.510,542 t€164k
LYDDEN9782091Vehicle carrier50.1 g CO₂/t·nm45.6+10%12.75,224 t€92k
MORNING MIDAS9289910Vehicle carrier59.3 g CO₂/t·nm55.3+7%15.014,331 t€230k
CELESTE NOVA9534054Oil tanker4.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+6%10.230,936 t€540k
BROOKLANDS9748289Vehicle carrier39.9 g CO₂/t·nm38.0+5%15.312,171 t€205k
HAMPSHIRE9377781Gas carrier (LPG)15.6 g CO₂/t·nm15.0+4%14.93,902 t€62k
NOBLE ACE9493365Vehicle carrier47.2 g CO₂/t·nm45.6+3%18.31,080 t€16k
DURHAM9889564Gas carrier (LPG)15.5 g CO₂/t·nm15.0+3%14.83,989 t€67k
DONINGTON9748291Vehicle carrier38.9 g CO₂/t·nm38.0+2%15.313,335 t€215k
MAERSK CAMPBELL9924209Container7.2 g CO₂/t·nm7.1+2%16.972,610 t€1.1m
MAERSK CANDOR9924223Container7.2 g CO₂/t·nm7.1+2%16.946,799 t€733k
INDIAN PARTNERSHIP9521409Bulk carrier5.0 g CO₂/t·nm4.9+2%11.85,921 t€102k
MAERSK CAMBRIDGE9924182Container7.2 g CO₂/t·nm7.1+2%16.851,684 t€788k
MAERSK CAMDEN9924194Container7.2 g CO₂/t·nm7.1+1%16.771,048 t€1.1m
MAERSK CANYON9924235Container7.1 g CO₂/t·nm7.1+1%16.857,093 t€873k
SATURN MOON9814430Oil tanker6.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−1%10.517,821 t€299k

30 of 69 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.