Navalyze · Container · Ship

MED BEYKOZ

IMO: 9064748
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 17,422 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Tekirdag
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.91 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC LARA, MSC LARA II

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,422 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

94.5

Container median 177 kg/nm (−47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.3 (+5%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−24%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,687 t

CO₂ emitted

5,313 t

5,395 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

17,853 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,768 h

74 days, 20% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 94.5 kg/nm · median 177 (−47%)

78.8Ranks 468 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 13.3 (−24%)

9.1Faster than 16% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+5%)

7.22Ranks 1,164 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports51%
From the EU21%
Into the EU19%
At berth in the EU9%

80% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,244 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

453 t

8.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+82 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MED BEYKOZ
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MED BEYKOZ
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MED BEYKOZ
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−16%	−14%	−38%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+11%	+3%	−27%	+6%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.8 kn	−18%	+11%	+202%	−37%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	+13%	−10%	+1%	+45%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	−53%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+1%	+7%	−2%	+1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.7 kn	−30%	+15%	+391%	−24%	3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	1,687	5,313	17,853	1,768	10.1	94.5	17.1	–
2024part-year	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	2,836	8,898	25,311	2,595	9.8	112	19.0	–
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	3,233	10,147	28,729	2,902	9.9	113	19.2	–
2023	not published	3,979	12,585	39,128	3,688	10.6	102	18.2	–
2022	not published	1,617	5,110	12,962	1,655	7.8	125	28.9	–
2021	not published	1,414	4,466	12,828	1,306	9.8	110	19.9	–
2020	not published	3,151	9,950	27,567	2,848	9.7	114	17.9	–
2019	not published	3,174	9,934	28,092	3,070	9.2	113	17.7	–
2018	not published	929	2,898	5,723	1,038	5.5	162	23.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	17.1	16.3	+5%	1,164 of 2,208	DNV	A+B
2024part-year	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	19.2	17.5	+10%	1,090 of 1,974	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	18.2	19.4	−6%	885 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	28.9	19.1	+51%	1,272 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	19.9	17.9	+11%	987 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	17.9	17.6	+2%	918 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	17.7	18.9	−6%	826 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	23.2	20.2	+15%	979 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.