Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.your view

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.
Ships	12
CO₂ emitted	63,689 t−9.0%
Fuel kg/nm	85.3
Average speed	9.8 kn
CO₂ at berth	6.5%
Ships burning LNG	0
Ships using alternative fuel	0
Main segment	Container

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.27.9 (+71% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Shipsin container	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, median ship	vs container medianlower is better	Fuel kg/nmfleet avg.	Average speedknots at sea	Hours at seaper ship per year	CO₂ at berthshare	LNG / alt. fuelships
MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	12	27.9	+71%	85.3	9.8	2,018	6.5%	–
Segment median		16.3	0%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

	Verifiers (ships)	A · delivery notes	B · tank monitoring	C · flow meters	D · direct
MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	DNV (12)	100%	100%	0%	0%

MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its segment, as on the ship's own page. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as the median ship. The cost of the gap compares each ship with ships of its size, as everywhere on the site. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

Ship	IMO	Segment	CO₂ per transport work	Segment median	vs median	Average speed	CO₂	Allowances	Cost of gap
MED URLA	9160920	Container	40.7 g CO₂/t·nm	16.3	+150%	10.6	4,776 t	€167k	€0
MED IZMIR	9143879	Container	38.6 g CO₂/t·nm	16.3	+137%	10.9	5,121 t	€174k	€0
MED DENIZLI	9106493	Container	33.9 g CO₂/t·nm	16.3	+108%	9.4	1,969 t	€65k	€0
MED CORLU	9106479	Container	29.8 g CO₂/t·nm	16.3	+83%	9.0	1,609 t	€52k	€0
MED TEKIRDAG	9265598	Container	29.2 g CO₂/t·nm	16.3	+79%	9.3	3,848 t	€110k	€0
MED CERKEZKOY	9147215	Container	29.2 g CO₂/t·nm	16.3	+79%	9.1	2,876 t	€95k	€0
MED CESME	9256365	Container	26.6 g CO₂/t·nm	16.3	+63%	6.5	8,207 t	€269k	€44k
MED TRABZON	9141780	Container	24.5 g CO₂/t·nm	16.3	+50%	11.6	12,395 t	€394k	€37k
MED SAMSUN	9225794	Container	22.1 g CO₂/t·nm	16.3	+36%	11.1	14,801 t	€467k	€0
MED MERSIN	9135638	Container	17.4 g CO₂/t·nm	16.3	+7%	9.2	1,725 t	€53k	€0
MED BEYKOZ	9064748	Container	17.1 g CO₂/t·nm	16.3	+5%	10.1	5,313 t	€223k	€0
MED AYDIN	9148025	Container	15.0 g CO₂/t·nm	16.3	−8%	8.1	1,051 t	€38k	€0

30 of 12 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
Groups combine ISM companies trading under the same name, and differently named companies only where a public source shows common ownership (linked in the member list). If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.